Re: Re: Re: Re: this long to do it (things yo momma says)
Hopefully your ignorant mouth will be silenced in order for you to understand that opposing views will benefit everyone. Your approval of censorship will come back to permanantly remove your life from your body.
In the words of Jordan Klepper, "We don't even see the irony!"
I’m curious as to when having an opposing opinion became trolling!
First, that comment was a lot more than just an opposing opinion. Second, I can see an argument for it being trolling. Third, I can also see an argument for it being abusive. It certainly doesn't contribute anything useful to the discussion, and it shouldn't be surprising that it got flagged. If the person had stated disagreement and backed it up with sound reasoning, it probably would not have, though there is sometimes a bit of a hive mind around here that flags any contrary comments.
I'm left wondering where this will end up. When there are only two mobile phone carriers left, and they're contemplating a merger, will the FCC or DOJ say anything then?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Dear New York Times,
From my understanding, the stuff that was publicly visible on the site didn't necessarily have that stuff, but when they were "hacked" they were storing the original versions of the files without that stuff being stripped.
If you're referring to the project to archive Parler content, that wasn't a hack, they just scraped publicly available stuff. If there was a hack/leak, it's something else I haven't heard about and if you have information about that I would be interested.
He just keeps trying to turn private property into public space again, by claiming that as long as a place is sufficiently popular it should belong to the people as a whole.
And yet he wraps that up by pointing out that private companies can enforce rules on their property, such as no crapping on the floor. He is very confused.
Now, Paul or Nasch or Toom or Rocky haven't weighed in yet. If they side with Gov Desantis and other Americans against Big Business I'll be pleasantly surprised and eat crow.
I side with the Constitution. You, apparently, do not. No surprise there.
can't withstand so much as a mild tap on the foot without being stretchered out in agony
You clearly do not know much about American football. Read "Slow Getting Up" if you want to find out about the kind of pain these guys deal with on a daily basis. The NFL has a lot of problems, but players who can't handle a minor injury is not one of them.
Re: Re: Re: And who pays for all the data I don't want?
It doesn't matter the amount, if they want to charge by bits of data, then they have an obligation to ensure ALL the bits are what the user requested.
They're not charging by the bit. They're charging if you go over a threshold. So it only makes a difference if the bits you didn't request cause you to go over the threshold.
What is it you think they're hiding? I'm not sure if you're saying people who object to gay slurs are secretly gay, and people who object to racial slurs are... secretly non white? Or what.
When someone calls for genocide, you can either (A) attack him or (B) defend him. There is no middle ground.
That's a false dichotomy fallacy. You can also C) ignore them.
Paul, Toom, Nasch (B) defended him.
Again with the hallucination / illiteracy. Go back and find where any of us defended that statement. Click "link to this" on that comment, and send us the link. When you are unable to complete this task because such a comment does not exist, I invite you to either admit you were wrong or go away and stop replying to this story.
On the post: EU Parliament Told Predictive Policing Software Relies On Dirty Data Generated By Corrupt Cops
Re: Lost/found/Stolen ID and Pii admin documents aka Planted Lea
Sentences. Use them!
On the post: Texas Power, Phone Outages Again Highlight How Infrastructure Underinvestment Will Be Fatal Moving Forward
Re: Re: Re:
That is what all the guns are supposed to be for, isn't it?
On the post: Conservative News Outlet Ordered To Pay More Than $250,000 In Legal Fees To Rachel Maddow, MSNBC
Re:
Nowhere for the executives to put their yachts in Wyoming.
On the post: Texas Power, Phone Outages Again Highlight How Infrastructure Underinvestment Will Be Fatal Moving Forward
droll: "curious or unusual in a way that provokes dry amusement."
Personally I don't find anything amusing about infrastructure policy.
On the post: Not Easy, Not Unreasonable, Not Censorship: The Decision To Ban Trump From Twitter
Re: Re: Re: Re: this long to do it (things yo momma says)
In the words of Jordan Klepper, "We don't even see the irony!"
On the post: Not Easy, Not Unreasonable, Not Censorship: The Decision To Ban Trump From Twitter
Re: Re: Re: Stupid Opinion
First, that comment was a lot more than just an opposing opinion. Second, I can see an argument for it being trolling. Third, I can also see an argument for it being abusive. It certainly doesn't contribute anything useful to the discussion, and it shouldn't be surprising that it got flagged. If the person had stated disagreement and backed it up with sound reasoning, it probably would not have, though there is sometimes a bit of a hive mind around here that flags any contrary comments.
On the post: 16 States Ask The FCC What The Hell Is The Point Of The Verizon Tracfone Merger
How far?
I'm left wondering where this will end up. When there are only two mobile phone carriers left, and they're contemplating a merger, will the FCC or DOJ say anything then?
On the post: NYT Easily Tracks Location Data From Capitol Riots, Highlighting Once Again How US Privacy Standards Are A Joke
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Dear New York Times,
If you're referring to the project to archive Parler content, that wasn't a hack, they just scraped publicly available stuff. If there was a hack/leak, it's something else I haven't heard about and if you have information about that I would be interested.
https://www.vice.com/en/article/n7vqew/the-hacker-who-archived-parler-explains-how-she-d id-it-and-what-comes-next
On the post: Now It's The Democrats Turn To Destroy The Open Internet: Mark Warner's 230 Reform Bill Is A Dumpster Fire Of Cluelessness
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Honeymoon period
I didn't say they're equivalent; I said both parties want to amend or repeal section 230.
On the post: Now It's The Democrats Turn To Destroy The Open Internet: Mark Warner's 230 Reform Bill Is A Dumpster Fire Of Cluelessness
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Honeymoon period
Unsupportable? Pick your news source of choice, there's plenty of information out there about how both parties want to go after section 230.
https://www.google.com/search?q=republican+attacks+on+section+230
https://www.google.com/search ?q=democrat+attacks+on+section+230
On the post: Senators Warner, Hirono, And Klobuchar Demand The End Of The Internet Economy
Re: Re: Re: Chicken-little garbage
And yet he wraps that up by pointing out that private companies can enforce rules on their property, such as no crapping on the floor. He is very confused.
On the post: NYT Easily Tracks Location Data From Capitol Riots, Highlighting Once Again How US Privacy Standards Are A Joke
Re: Re: Re: Re: Dear New York Times,
Did you really think police weren't already tracking BLM protestors?
https://theconversation.com/police-surveillance-of-black-lives-matter-shows-the-danger-t echnology-poses-to-democracy-142194
On the post: Various States All Pile On To Push Blatantly Unconstitutional Laws That Say Social Media Can't Moderate
Re: Re: Uhh, what?
I side with the Constitution. You, apparently, do not. No surprise there.
On the post: Annual Reminder: You Can Probably Just Call The Super Bowl The Super Bowl
Re: Re: Re: Re: Has the NFL copypatented
Oops, context fail.
On the post: Annual Reminder: You Can Probably Just Call The Super Bowl The Super Bowl
Re: Re: Has the NFL copypatented
You clearly do not know much about American football. Read "Slow Getting Up" if you want to find out about the kind of pain these guys deal with on a daily basis. The NFL has a lot of problems, but players who can't handle a minor injury is not one of them.
On the post: Comcast Wants A Cookie For Suspending Its Bullshit Broadband Caps For a Few Months
Re: Re: Re: And who pays for all the data I don't want?
They're not charging by the bit. They're charging if you go over a threshold. So it only makes a difference if the bits you didn't request cause you to go over the threshold.
On the post: Content Moderation Case Study: GitHub Attempts To Moderate Banned Words Contained In Hosted Repositories (2015)
Re: Re:
What is it you think they're hiding? I'm not sure if you're saying people who object to gay slurs are secretly gay, and people who object to racial slurs are... secretly non white? Or what.
On the post: Annual Reminder: You Can Probably Just Call The Super Bowl The Super Bowl
Re: Nope.
You might want to update your naming convention since it hasn't been held in January since 2002.
On the post: Parole Violator Who Raided Senate Building Sold Out By The GPS Unit Attached To Him For Previous Parole Violations
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
That's a false dichotomy fallacy. You can also C) ignore them.
Again with the hallucination / illiteracy. Go back and find where any of us defended that statement. Click "link to this" on that comment, and send us the link. When you are unable to complete this task because such a comment does not exist, I invite you to either admit you were wrong or go away and stop replying to this story.
On the post: After Years Of Ignoring Abuse At A Women's Prison, Department Of Corrections Suspends Nearly Three Dozen Employees
Re:
Distressing that this has to be said again, but sexually abusing sexual abusers is not the solution to sexual abuse.
Next >>