Re: Re: Re: Re: Privacy is Respecting The People Who Ask For Pri
I knew what /s meant. /s = sarcasm. Privacy is nothing to be lightly joking about. If the government won’t respect the privacy of its people, then they shouldn’t be in office at all. The American government has always promised to be run by the people, yet it never is. They break their promises more than they realize. They think us Americans shouldn’t learn the truth about why they’re being so scandalous. Their corrupt, racist and sexist remarks are disrespectful and unacceptable. I may be white, but I’ll gladly defend any race and any gender from the racist and sexist affairs that our own government is charging at us. I respect every race and every gender and every age and every generation, but I will not let our bipartisan government throw us into anarchy. They force us to choose sides, and they force us against each other while they continuously make everything worse. In 2020, I hope people will realize that the Democratic and Republican debate needs a complete overhaul, because apparently Common Sense Isn’t So Common Anymore!
Don’t let money consume your intentions. It’ll only get worse. Don’t ignore the fundamentals and don’t twist the truth for a lump of cash. That’s how bad reputations start. No wonder people don’t like Democrats and Republicans: both sides berate each other because they won’t admit that they both are corrupted by their lusts for cash at the expense of the lives of millions.
If you want a fair internet, don’t be greedy about money and admit the truth. The truth shall set your free.
Re: Re: Privacy is Respecting The People Who Ask For Privacy
You clearly didn’t read my comment correctly. The bathroom comparison is meant to represent that government agencies have no respect for our privacy. They disrespect the people they serve, and their racist, sexist attitude towards their people is downright cruel, retarded, and unacceptable.
Privacy is Respecting The People Who Ask For Privacy
Of course it should not be illegal to keep people’s internet searches private. If the government doesn’t respect privacy on the internet, that’s like the FBI having an agent stand with you in the bathroom as he watches you pee/poop (within the public stall for non-residential examples such as colleges and offices) and then reports how many bowel movements you made which would be leaked for others to see. In a word, NASTY!
Privacy is important in every aspect, and because we have privacy and respect outside of the internet, we need the respect of privacy on the internet as well. Not in terms of censorships - don’t get the wrong idea. That’s why some browsers have a private tab available so that Google (or whatever internet company provides the browser) won’t keep record of what you searched online in a private tab. They even have that feature on the iPhone’s Safari app as well.
I apologize for any misspells. Using an iPhone’s keyboard is hard no matter what size phone you use.
On the post: Telcos And Rupert Murdoch Pushing Nonsense Story That Google Helping Keep Your Internet Activity More Private Is An Antitrust Violation
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Privacy is Respecting The People Who Ask
No I did not look it up. I knew what is was.
On the post: Telcos And Rupert Murdoch Pushing Nonsense Story That Google Helping Keep Your Internet Activity More Private Is An Antitrust Violation
Re: Re: Re: Re: Privacy is Respecting The People Who Ask For Pri
I knew what /s meant. /s = sarcasm. Privacy is nothing to be lightly joking about. If the government won’t respect the privacy of its people, then they shouldn’t be in office at all. The American government has always promised to be run by the people, yet it never is. They break their promises more than they realize. They think us Americans shouldn’t learn the truth about why they’re being so scandalous. Their corrupt, racist and sexist remarks are disrespectful and unacceptable. I may be white, but I’ll gladly defend any race and any gender from the racist and sexist affairs that our own government is charging at us. I respect every race and every gender and every age and every generation, but I will not let our bipartisan government throw us into anarchy. They force us to choose sides, and they force us against each other while they continuously make everything worse. In 2020, I hope people will realize that the Democratic and Republican debate needs a complete overhaul, because apparently Common Sense Isn’t So Common Anymore!
On the post: US Courts Rep Ignores Everything About The Internet, Says PACER Access Can Never Be Free Because It Costs Money To Operate
Want A Better Solution? Here’s A Starter!
Don’t let money consume your intentions. It’ll only get worse. Don’t ignore the fundamentals and don’t twist the truth for a lump of cash. That’s how bad reputations start. No wonder people don’t like Democrats and Republicans: both sides berate each other because they won’t admit that they both are corrupted by their lusts for cash at the expense of the lives of millions.
If you want a fair internet, don’t be greedy about money and admit the truth. The truth shall set your free.
On the post: Telcos And Rupert Murdoch Pushing Nonsense Story That Google Helping Keep Your Internet Activity More Private Is An Antitrust Violation
Re: Re: Privacy is Respecting The People Who Ask For Privacy
You clearly didn’t read my comment correctly. The bathroom comparison is meant to represent that government agencies have no respect for our privacy. They disrespect the people they serve, and their racist, sexist attitude towards their people is downright cruel, retarded, and unacceptable.
On the post: Telcos And Rupert Murdoch Pushing Nonsense Story That Google Helping Keep Your Internet Activity More Private Is An Antitrust Violation
Privacy is Respecting The People Who Ask For Privacy
Of course it should not be illegal to keep people’s internet searches private. If the government doesn’t respect privacy on the internet, that’s like the FBI having an agent stand with you in the bathroom as he watches you pee/poop (within the public stall for non-residential examples such as colleges and offices) and then reports how many bowel movements you made which would be leaked for others to see. In a word, NASTY!
Privacy is important in every aspect, and because we have privacy and respect outside of the internet, we need the respect of privacy on the internet as well. Not in terms of censorships - don’t get the wrong idea. That’s why some browsers have a private tab available so that Google (or whatever internet company provides the browser) won’t keep record of what you searched online in a private tab. They even have that feature on the iPhone’s Safari app as well.
I apologize for any misspells. Using an iPhone’s keyboard is hard no matter what size phone you use.
On the post: Massive Study Proves Once And For All That No, Net Neutrality Did Not Hurt Broadband Investment
Pai Just Got Phoenix Wright’d
Pai: Net Neutrality must be repealed to protect the Internet.
The Massive Study That Proves Otherwise: OBJECTION!
On the post: Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt
I’m glad some people got the Pokémon reference with my comment on the EU Directive
On the post: RomUniverse To Attempt To Crowdfund Legal Defense, Which Isn't Going Well At All
Re: Re: WELL had you READ the background, you wouldn’t be blue
No. All I smell is Blue Ball’s Blue Waffles. Gordon Ramsay wouldn’t approve of the trolling menu being served.
On the post: Working Futures, An Anthology Of Speculative Fiction About The Future Of Work
Re: Re: Re: Congratulations
Thanks.
On the post: Just As Everyone Predicted: EU Copyright Directive's Link Tax Won't Lead To Google Paying Publishers
Re: Re: Re:
Whatever you do, don’t jinx it.
On the post: Just As Everyone Predicted: EU Copyright Directive's Link Tax Won't Lead To Google Paying Publishers
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Lol I love when innocent irony plays out
On the post: Just As Everyone Predicted: EU Copyright Directive's Link Tax Won't Lead To Google Paying Publishers
Re: Re: Re:
Oooooooh. Thanks.
On the post: Just As Everyone Predicted: EU Copyright Directive's Link Tax Won't Lead To Google Paying Publishers
Re:
What’s FTFY supposed to stand for?
On the post: Just As Everyone Predicted: EU Copyright Directive's Link Tax Won't Lead To Google Paying Publishers
Re: Re: What about Bing?
Yeah, DuckDuckGo counts as well. And it waddled till the very next day.
On the post: What's Australian For Streisand Effect? Perhaps It's Fatty McFuckhead
Re:
And the clowns are still running the show.
On the post: Just As Everyone Predicted: EU Copyright Directive's Link Tax Won't Lead To Google Paying Publishers
European Union Uses Reverse Psychology
—-
It Didn’t Have Any Effect
—-
European Union fainted from disbelief
—-
Common Sense Wins
On the post: People Freaking Out About Amazon Copying A Shoe Are Totally Missing The Point
Re: Re: Re: Wow, So Good At Jumping to Conclusions!
I meant to say “jump” not hump
On the post: Working Futures, An Anthology Of Speculative Fiction About The Future Of Work
Re: Congratulations
“payoff” not pyoff
On the post: Working Futures, An Anthology Of Speculative Fiction About The Future Of Work
Congratulations
Good job, Mike. I’m sure all of your hard work will indeed pyoff.
On the post: DC Court: State Secrets Privilege Trumps Any Citizens' Right To Know Whether Or Not Their Own Gov't Is Trying To Kill Them
Correction
Correction: ”they’re” not their
Next >>