The saying holds that the thread is supported by a chain of increasingly large misspellings. Beneath each misspelled reply is yet another: it is "typos all the way down".
Just in case any Last Week Tonight researchers are looking for their next topic of conversation, I would like to categorically state that Mike Masnick is not a dingo.
[REDACTED] is a very [REDACTED] and should be afforded the greatest [REDACTED] the US can give. Unfortunately, the [REDACTED] has caused [REDACTED] and now the US Government must now [REDACTED] themselves.
It's the old "bystander principle" - or, as Douglas Adams so succinctly satirized it, the "Somebody Else's Problem field". What's one more methhead to society?
After all, some people are irredeemable, aren't they?
After all, these people aren't exactly useful or wanted, are they?
After all, noone's gonna care if they get beaten up, are they?
Better to just stay safe and not get involved. They could be DANGEROUS, for Gawd's sake!
Thank god the police were on the scene to stop the assault on a homeless man... oh, right.
Absolutely disgraceful. I note that the Exhibit shown in the article shows Officer Ramos' elbow being bloodied. I suppose that's what happens in an all-out curb stomping.
When Ramos informed Kelly that "[his] fists" were "getting ready to fuck [Kelly] up", does that not show premeditation? Aside from that, how can Kelly be called the aggressor after being faced with such inflammatory language?
Besides, surely the goal of the police force should be to subdue the suspect, not to turn his face into something resembling a side of raw beef.
Although I know it would most likely be illegal to answer the question, I would like to know how the jurors justified letting these guys off.
This can't be OotB. This posting actually makes sense, is on topic, doesn't berate Mike, doesn't mention Google at all and is not inflammatory at all.
I don't know whether to be disappointed that someone else is using OotB's name or glad that this wasn't the usual load of horse-hockey that we usually get from this name...
On the post: Judge Otis Wright Slams 'Made Up' Government 'Plot' Designed To Ensnare Gullible Poor People
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Primatologist Tells Court That Macaque Monkeys Are, Like, Super Smart, So They Should Totally Get Copyrights
Re: Re:
On the post: Certification: How The US Demands Even More Concessions After Trade Agreements Have Been Signed And Ratified
On the post: Once Again, John Oliver Covers A Techdirt Topic: This Time, It's Patent Trolls
On the post: TSA Agents Outwitted By Cory Doctorow's Unlocked, 'TSA-Safe' Suitcase
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: How about an impenetrable cable tie?
function Funny(comment, i){
If(i = 0) {
return comment + "ALIENS!";
}
Else {
return Funny(comment, i - 1);
}
}
Funny("funny comment about ",);
On the post: Red Bull Disputes Old Ox Brewery Trademarked Logo/Name Because, Seriously, An Ox Is Just A Castrated Bull
On the post: The MPAA Forces Craft Brewer To Abandon Its 'Rated R' Beer Brand
On the post: FCC Commissioner Pai Continues His Strange, Somewhat Incoherent Assault On Netflix
Re: Re:
On the post: Harry Reid Wants To Attach Part Of SOPA To Surveillance Reform Bill
Re: Re: Re: Let's just kill music
On the post: Apple's Responds To Tech Mag Showing The Amazing Bending Phone By Freezing Them Out Of Bendy Apple Products
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: Why NSA's Betrayal Of Internet Security Is Akin To A Massive Public Health Disaster
Re:
It's never fucking lupus/the NSA...
On the post: Entire Court Discussion Of Feds Blocking US Citizen From Flying To No Fly List Trial... Redacted
Re: The meaning of redaction
On the post: Entire Court Discussion Of Feds Blocking US Citizen From Flying To No Fly List Trial... Redacted
[REDACTED] Madlibs?
What do I think of this situation? [REDACTED]
On the post: Jury Finds Two Officers Charged In Beating Death Of Homeless Man Not Guilty
Re: Re:
After all, some people are irredeemable, aren't they?
After all, these people aren't exactly useful or wanted, are they?
After all, noone's gonna care if they get beaten up, are they?
Better to just stay safe and not get involved. They could be DANGEROUS, for Gawd's sake!
Thank god the police were on the scene to stop the assault on a homeless man... oh, right.
On the post: Jury Finds Two Officers Charged In Beating Death Of Homeless Man Not Guilty
Re: Re:
Having said that, humanity is/should be universal.
On the post: Court Rules That Woman Wrongfully Placed On No Fly List Should Be Taken Off The List... We Think
No threat to national security means no national security exemption from releasing the full order. QED.
On the post: Jury Finds Two Officers Charged In Beating Death Of Homeless Man Not Guilty
When Ramos informed Kelly that "[his] fists" were "getting ready to fuck [Kelly] up", does that not show premeditation? Aside from that, how can Kelly be called the aggressor after being faced with such inflammatory language?
Besides, surely the goal of the police force should be to subdue the suspect, not to turn his face into something resembling a side of raw beef.
Although I know it would most likely be illegal to answer the question, I would like to know how the jurors justified letting these guys off.
On the post: CEO Of 21st Century Fox Thinks People Aren't Really Asking For A La Carte TV Channels
Re:
I don't know whether to be disappointed that someone else is using OotB's name or glad that this wasn't the usual load of horse-hockey that we usually get from this name...
On the post: Google Announces More Child Porn Blocking Efforts While David Cameron Offers To Throw The GCHQ At The Problem
"Won't someone PLEASE think of the children!?"
On the post: Amicus Brief From Public Knowledge Distills Ultramercial's 'Complex' Patent To 16 Lines Of Code
Re: Better than vague hope: argue against ALL software patents.
Some of us like jazz... And is that an actual concession of a good point to TechDirt's writing I see?
Maybe some of us should be nicer to you, Blue.
Not quite sure what part(s) of this piece you're actually critiquing, though. Elaborate, please?
Next >>