Re: "Advertising is content is advertising" pitfall
You assume? Mike, you haven't lived until you've been in a Waffle House at 3 AM on a Satuday night.
I know right? It's a strange mix of fear and hilarity served with a side of good, cheap food.
Are you saying that BMI is not a record label? I don't know for sure since I haven't looked into it. Regardless let me rephrase to try and fit your fucking standards [Edited parts in CAPS]:
The problem with this is that even if people do buy the CD, THE RECORD LABEL will only make like $15 per CD and the artist will probably take LESS THAN $.05 of that. Now, if they sue everyone in sight, BMI will make like $6k if they settle EACH YEAR and $30k if they win the case. The best part is that the artist won't see a fucking dime!
The problem with this is that even if people do buy the CD, BMI will only make like $15 per CD and the artist will probably take like $.05 of that. Now, if they sue everyone in sight, BMI will make like $6k if they settle and $30k if they win the case. The best part is that the artist won't see a fucking dime!
Also, use the "reply to this" button next time please.
One way to solve that problem is to say something like, "If you sue an American company in a foreign country over IP issues, you lose your ability to sell your product in America for 5 years."
We have one of the largest markets in the world, so we should use it as leverage against whomever needs leveraging.
We wouldn't be in this mess if the government knew what it was doing. The housing and economic collapse, $14.5 TRILLION debt, the sad state of our IP system, shitty schools, overpriced healthcare, economy draining entitlement programs, the failed War on Drugs, 3 military wars, etc. can attest to that.
For all the reasons above, I consider myself a limited-government libertarian. The less the government can fuck up the better.
You're right, the second option was correct. I just failed to realize that before I hit the submit button.
I'm glad that you can read at least read and write on a 4th grade level.
Is it 'to apology' now? Or did you mean 'apologizes for'?
I'll show you how these two short, stupid sentences are hard to read.
Is it 'to apology' now?
This is confusing because:
"Is it..." What is "it" referring to?
"'to apology'" This is just bad grammar.
"now?" "Now" as opposed to when?
This could have been more clearly written as "Did you mean 'to apologize?'"
Or did you mean 'apologizes for'?
This one isn't quite the trainwreck as the first, but when most people are trying to decipher what the hell the first sentence meant, they don't give the second much thought. Still, you missed some punctuation.
Now, as for my having dyslexia, it's true. I do have it; however, when I don't have to dredge through idiotic and grammatically incorrect posts, it's not a problem.
On the post: Waffle House Says Rap Song Called Waffle House Violates Its Trademark
Re: "Advertising is content is advertising" pitfall
I know right? It's a strange mix of fear and hilarity served with a side of good, cheap food.
On the post: Restaurant Owner Ordered To Pay BMI $30,450 For 'Illegally Playing' Four Unlicensed Songs
Re: Re: Re:
The problem with this is that even if people do buy the CD, THE RECORD LABEL will only make like $15 per CD and the artist will probably take LESS THAN $.05 of that. Now, if they sue everyone in sight, BMI will make like $6k if they settle EACH YEAR and $30k if they win the case. The best part is that the artist won't see a fucking dime!
On the post: Restaurant Owner Ordered To Pay BMI $30,450 For 'Illegally Playing' Four Unlicensed Songs
Re: Re:
Say I'm having a Kegger with 50+ people over and I play one of their songs. Would I risk?
What if I was charging $5 for a cup?
On the post: Restaurant Owner Ordered To Pay BMI $30,450 For 'Illegally Playing' Four Unlicensed Songs
Re:
Also, use the "reply to this" button next time please.
On the post: Restaurant Owner Ordered To Pay BMI $30,450 For 'Illegally Playing' Four Unlicensed Songs
Can someone expand on this?
On the post: UK Prime Minister Wants To Ban Suspected Rioters From Facebook & Twitter
On the post: How One Unverified Claim Of A $7,500 'Loss' From Cybercrime Translates To $1.5 Billion In Losses In The Press
Re:
On the post: Why President Obama Has The 'Jobs' Equation Backwards; Supporting Patent Reform That Limits Jobs
Re: Re: Re: Competition
On the post: Why President Obama Has The 'Jobs' Equation Backwards; Supporting Patent Reform That Limits Jobs
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Typo
FTFY
On the post: Why President Obama Has The 'Jobs' Equation Backwards; Supporting Patent Reform That Limits Jobs
Re: Re:
On the post: DOJ Had 400% More Emergencies That Required Immediate Warrantless Info From ISPs?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
♥♥♥
TC
On the post: Why President Obama Has The 'Jobs' Equation Backwards; Supporting Patent Reform That Limits Jobs
Re: Re:
On the post: Why President Obama Has The 'Jobs' Equation Backwards; Supporting Patent Reform That Limits Jobs
Re: Re: Re: Re: Typo
I hope this turns into a spelling & grammar correction shit-storm.
On the post: Why President Obama Has The 'Jobs' Equation Backwards; Supporting Patent Reform That Limits Jobs
Re: Competition
We have one of the largest markets in the world, so we should use it as leverage against whomever needs leveraging.
TC
On the post: Why President Obama Has The 'Jobs' Equation Backwards; Supporting Patent Reform That Limits Jobs
We wouldn't be in this mess if the government knew what it was doing. The housing and economic collapse, $14.5 TRILLION debt, the sad state of our IP system, shitty schools, overpriced healthcare, economy draining entitlement programs, the failed War on Drugs, 3 military wars, etc. can attest to that.
For all the reasons above, I consider myself a limited-government libertarian. The less the government can fuck up the better.
On the post: How To Make A Mockery Of Your Own Law School: Sue Your Critics
Re: Can they sue themselves for their own bad advice?
You know what they say: 68% of all statistics are made up on the spot.
TC
On the post: What Happens When A Reasonable Developer Runs Into Aggressive Trademark Lawyers?
Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: What Happens When A Reasonable Developer Runs Into Aggressive Trademark Lawyers?
Re: Re: Re:
I'm glad that you can read at least read and write on a 4th grade level.
Is it 'to apology' now? Or did you mean 'apologizes for'?
I'll show you how these two short, stupid sentences are hard to read.
Is it 'to apology' now?
This is confusing because:
"Is it..." What is "it" referring to?
"'to apology'" This is just bad grammar.
"now?" "Now" as opposed to when?
This could have been more clearly written as "Did you mean 'to apologize?'"
Or did you mean 'apologizes for'?
This one isn't quite the trainwreck as the first, but when most people are trying to decipher what the hell the first sentence meant, they don't give the second much thought. Still, you missed some punctuation.
Now, as for my having dyslexia, it's true. I do have it; however, when I don't have to dredge through idiotic and grammatically incorrect posts, it's not a problem.
On the post: Patent Troll Lawyers Smacked Down, Made To Pay Sanctions, For Mass Lawsuits Followed By Quick Settlement Offers
Re: It just occurred to me
"Give us what we want, or we drop the gavel."
VS.
"Give us what we want, or we drop the bomb."
On the post: DOJ Had 400% More Emergencies That Required Immediate Warrantless Info From ISPs?
Re: Re: Re: Re:
I see people standing up for what they believe in all over the world, and I can't help but think, "Why doesn't that happen here?"
Unfortunately, I already know the answer: We're more afraid of the government than the government is of us.
Next >>