Finally, a smack against copyright maximalists. Can't wait to hear them try to explain this one away and how they still "own the rights" and they were shaking people down for payments in good faith...
Quote from the article on ArsTechnica: "This is a great step forward for all music creators," said Recording Industry Association of America Chairman and CEO Cary Sherman. "Music has tremendous value, whether it was made in 1970 or 2015. We hope others take note of this important agreement and follow SiriusXM's example."
Well, that sounds like the typical slimeball MPAA/RIAA speak we've come to expect. Basically some form of: 'Just look at all the money it has made us! And look at how little we've passed on to the people that wrote it! I mean, we said it had tremendous value -- we never said that value was for the artists! Hahaha, suckers!'
Maybe we can finally stop using SSNs as a unique identifier for people, or pretend it confirms someones' identity, since every company seems to request/require/have access to people's SSNs (and then treat that access with the type of non-chalant, non-caring attitude we've come to expect in the cyber security age).
I can still get parts for my 1952 antique tractor. Parts I don't have, I can find used, or have machined. In my work in electronics, I find that anything that has been built before can be built again, even if the parts that went into it are obsolete (microprocessors, etc.). It just takes money and planning. Did they just now realize they have a parts problem? Or did they plan this as a convenient excuse and not keep parts on hand or have orders in for replacement parts in advance?
I like the "I took a picture and he asked me for ID", because in what world does that make sense? How is that even a relevant question!? Ugh. This makes me sad.
Ugh, nothing is worse in the checkout lane at the store than the person who decides they're going to pay by check... Only, they just heard their total, and NOW they start looking for their checkbook. Rather than, you know, filling everything out but the total ahead of time... Or even just having it in hand ready to go! I'm the type of guy who usually shops without a cart and only has 2 or 3 items in hand that I specifically came in for, and this drives me crazy. Express lanes are the greatest myth of all time!
I am not a person who tells people to use a specific site or anything like that. What I am prone to do is pass along links of relevant stories of interest. For me, that is usually things related to musicians and copyright expansion and software patents (as it covers my interests and hobbies of software development, making music, and reading).
As for commenting... It depends. If the story has a low post count, or is a very relevant topic to me, I will always go in and read the comments. 80% the time I post a comment, it is because I want to comment on the story. The other 20% of the time, it is because I want to comment on something somebody else has said. I usually will make it a point to post if my viewpoint is somehow contrarian to the direction that the comments are going (no need for another "me too" post, ya know?).
Oh, and if I think I have something funny or insightful to say (ie. a relevant joke pops into my head), and the topic has a low post count, I'll almost always post as well.
I think it's just collusion with the toner cartridge industry lobby! First they get you with vendor lock in to their specific cartridges, then they get the government to use tankerloads of black ink per page!
On the post: Happy Birthday Copyright Bombshell: New Evidence Warner Music Previously Hid Shows Song Is Public Domain
On the post: SiriusXM Finally Wins A Case Over Pre-1972 Music... And Promptly Settles Such Cases With RIAA
My favorite quote...
Well, that sounds like the typical slimeball MPAA/RIAA speak we've come to expect. Basically some form of: 'Just look at all the money it has made us! And look at how little we've passed on to the people that wrote it! I mean, we said it had tremendous value -- we never said that value was for the artists! Hahaha, suckers!'
On the post: Hack Of Federal Gov't Employee Info Is Much, Much Worse Than Originally Stated: Unencrypted Social Security Numbers Leaked
On a side note about SSNs...
On the post: Will The Vulcan Salute Live Long And Prosper? The Rush To Lock Up 'Cultural Expression'
Re:
"Yeah, we smoke when we shoot the bird!"
On the post: Nokia CEO: We Have To Get Rid Of Net Neutrality, Otherwise Self-Driving Cars Will Keep On Crashing Into Each Other
On the post: Capcom Removes Advertised Offline Co-Op From Resident Evil Reboot, Updates Steam Page After Sales Begin
On the post: What A Strong Modding Community Can Do: How Doom Has Been Yanked Into The Selfie Age
Man, I miss playing Doom and Wolfenstein in the 90s...
On the post: MLB Claims That Finance Company's 'W' Logo Violates 2 MLB Teams' Trademarks
On the post: Sorry: AT&T & Verizon Can't Upgrade Or Repair Your Aging DSL Line Because Parts Are Too Hard To Find
On the post: SWAT Team Shows Up In Ferguson, Detains Reporters Live Tweeting Their Actions
On the post: Tropico 5 Game Hits A Little Too Close To Home For Newly-Minted Thai Military Junta
sarcasm ahead
Won't somebody think of the military juntas!?
On the post: DailyDirt: Waiting In Line Isn't Fun
On the post: This Week In Techdirt History
Or, even worse, the travesty that befell Robert Morris due to it.
On the post: What Makes You Tell Others About Techdirt?
As for commenting... It depends. If the story has a low post count, or is a very relevant topic to me, I will always go in and read the comments. 80% the time I post a comment, it is because I want to comment on the story. The other 20% of the time, it is because I want to comment on something somebody else has said. I usually will make it a point to post if my viewpoint is somehow contrarian to the direction that the comments are going (no need for another "me too" post, ya know?).
Oh, and if I think I have something funny or insightful to say (ie. a relevant joke pops into my head), and the topic has a low post count, I'll almost always post as well.
On the post: White House Finishes Review Of CIA Terror Report: Feinstein Wants To Know Why It's Basically All Blacked Out
Re: Re:
On the post: White House Finishes Review Of CIA Terror Report: Feinstein Wants To Know Why It's Basically All Blacked Out
On the post: Another SuperPAC Trying Another Approach To Getting 'Dark' Money Out Of Politics
On the post: Peak Internet Dismisses Defamation Suit Against Former Customer Who Complained About Its Lousy Connection Speeds
ISP: "But, you have a witches nose."
Customer: "They put this on me."
ISP: "No! No we didn't! Well... Yeah, we did do that. But she is still a witch!"
On the post: City Of London Police Inserting 'This Website Has Been Reported To Police' Banner Ads On Websites With No Legal Review
On the post: Wikileaks Reveals Super Injunction Blocking Reporting On Massive Australian Corruption Case Involving Leaders Of Malaysia, Indonesia & Vietnam
Next >>