If your ISP is owned by the Government, they can not interfere with your speech (except for a short list of limitations). - See Constitution 1st amendment.
If your ISP is owned by a corporation, they can restrict you any way they want for any reason (including everything in the above 'short list'). - See EULA they make you agree to./div>
At this point, anytime I see an "expert" claim that it's possible to pull this off, I assume that this "expert" is secretly a black hat hacker trying to make it easier for them and their black hat buddies to break encryption./div>
I'd guess Backpage could have challenged the constitutionality of the law the second it was signed. All of the noise made about SESTA / FOSTA targeting Backpage specifically may have given them standing.
With Backpage already gone, it will be more difficult for anyone else to challenge the law until it's used against them.
Hell, the feds won't even need to charge anyone under the law, just being able to say "it'd be a shame if your nice little website violated SESTA / FOSTA" will probably be enough to make any site "voluntarily" take down whatever the government wants./div>
That may be what those words mean to you, but they mean different things for different people. For me, they are interchangeable depending on what I'm doing.
People *make* all kinds of things using other things as components.
While my Grandma could make a Raspberry Pie from scratch, my soldering skills will never make me a Raspberry Pi./div>
Which is a greater threat to free speech?
If your ISP is owned by a corporation, they can restrict you any way they want for any reason (including everything in the above 'short list'). - See EULA they make you agree to./div>
Oh that's easy
Just go to facebook.com./div>
We do have Secure Encryption Backdoors!
Oh, and they can only be retrieved by the current FBI Director, in person./div>
(untitled comment)
Maybe Backpage HAD to come down before the law was signed
With Backpage already gone, it will be more difficult for anyone else to challenge the law until it's used against them.
Hell, the feds won't even need to charge anyone under the law, just being able to say "it'd be a shame if your nice little website violated SESTA / FOSTA" will probably be enough to make any site "voluntarily" take down whatever the government wants./div>
Wardriving for guns to steal
Here's another scenario.
Simply adapt the setup in the "Screwdriving" article to detect these "safes".
Make a list of houses and wait till the owners are out, break in, pop open the crackerjack box for your prize.
Even if they are hidden, there are a lot of apps you could use to watch the Bluetooth signal strength and play hot/cold till you find it.
/div>Could be fun
Use a Raspberry Pi Zero W ($10) with a USB battery pack. Put it in your pocket.
Go look at the "safes" and turn on their Bluetooth "feature".
Ask the salesman why they won't stay closed. Watch him play wack-a-mole trying to get them to stay closed./div>
More accurate name
Not to worry
Ads are not helping the terrorists.
Adding ads to terrorist content is an effective way to reduce its reach!/div>
Fair comparison
Dish + Direct TV + Comcast all at the same time.
Let's not forget to include below the line fees, equipment and installation costs./div>
I don't get it
Everytime his silly face hits my screen there's a giant banner for Reese's./div>
Re:
Who is being sued is a major factor./div>
Good use for bad law?
Re: Re: Hey Apple...
People *make* all kinds of things using other things as components.
While my Grandma could make a Raspberry Pie from scratch, my soldering skills will never make me a Raspberry Pi./div>
Hey Apple...
'Mecca For Hackers'
You spelled 'Makers' wrong.
/div>Question for Trump
I appreciate how Microsoft handled the Windows 10 rollout
Instead, I dropped the half that was ass and now I'm full Fedora.
It might take a little more effort sometimes, but I'm also learning a ton of new stuff. So I guess its a win/win when there's now windows.
As an added bonus, it's so much more fun when that guy from "windows support service" calls./div>
Re:
This is a separate related discussion, but restaurants should simply raise their rates by %15 and pay their staff better./div>
(untitled comment)
Which of course would probably lead to an in-person visit..../div>
More comments from Blaine >>
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by Blaine.
Submit a story now.
Tools & Services
TwitterFacebook
RSS
Podcast
Research & Reports
Company
About UsAdvertising Policies
Privacy
Contact
Help & FeedbackMedia Kit
Sponsor/Advertise
Submit a Story
More
Copia InstituteInsider Shop
Support Techdirt