Verizon-Funded Group Claims Killing Net Neutrality Would Really Help Puerto Rico Right Now
from the really-bad-taste dept
We've long noted how one of the sleazier telecom industry lobbying tactics involves paying minority, diversity, or other groups to parrot policies that actually undermine their constituents, but provide the illusion of public support for shitty positions. Like when the cable industry paid Jesse Jackson to claim that trying to bring competition to the cable box was akin to racism in the 1960's American South. Or when AT&T paid the The Hispanic Institute to support the company's planned acquisition of T-Mobile, ignoring that the deal would have killed tens of thousands of jobs, while driving up wireless rates for all Americans.
Because there appears to be zero public repercussion for this grotesque tactic, it has continued to be highly effective -- and has been of great use to AT&T, Verizon and Comcast as they attempt to gut net neutrality rules. While this sort of group co-opting is always in bad taste, the Intercept noticed that the Verizon-funded National Puerto Rican Chamber of Commerce decided to take things to the next level this week. In an editorial over at The Hill, executive director Justin Vélez-Hagan claimed killing net neutrality would aid storm-stricken Puerto Rico:
"My organization’s interests — especially those of small businesses and entrepreneurs in Puerto Rico who now need to be afforded every advantage and opportunity to grow more than ever before — and our members’ mutual experience have made it clear that the best thing for America’s fragile economy will be for the FCC to continue its plan to repeal the unnecessary regulations."
Vélez-Hagan wrote that the public should back the effort by Pai and others to place the Republican majority in Congress in charge of remaking net neutrality rules. Doing so, Vélez-Hagan wrote, would provide the “incentive for businesses to invest in Puerto Rico (and others impacted by natural disasters) instead of relying solely on relief packages.”
So one, as documented countless times, the claim that modest U.S. net neutrality rules (which didn't go half as far as other international implementations in Canada, India or elsewhere) hurt broadband investment is indisuptable nonsense, a position supported by SEC filings, earnings reports, and ISP executives' own statements. That doesn't stop the broadband industry from paying countless economists, fauxcademics, astroturfers, politicians, diversity groups and other paid policy parrots to repeat this claim ad nauseam -- despite all of them knowing full well it simply isn't true.
Two, the idea that gutting popular consumer protections will magically help Puerto Rico rebuild is both nonsensical and offensive. Many Puerto Ricans continue to struggle to get clean drinking water and medical care, and most telecom services won't be restored until sometime next year. The idea that Puerto Ricans have the luxury to worry about net neutrality right now is obnoxious tone deafness, and the claim that killing effective, useful consumer protections is almost as good as traditional relief funding is both ignorant and dangerous.
Of course, since this cozy quid pro quo is never clearly put into writing, groups like this can usually hide behind a quick "no comment" or some faux breathless indignation at the idea these groups are little more than glorified parrots for industry. Meanwhile, outlets like the Hill are more than happy to print this kind of prattle without the slightest funding and conflict of interest disclosures, only perpetuating the problem.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: competition, justin velez-hagan, net neutrality, puerto rico
Companies: national puerto rican chamber of commerce, verizon
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
"... the best thing for America’s fragile economy..."
Whoa... don't use that phrase near Chairman Pai's boss! He MAGA'd the economy, from what I hear.
This is the problem with astroturfing; you can't manage the messaging with any nuance, and your amateur apologists accidentally say things that don't match the supplied narrative. Or, worse yet, they might say something that's true.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Editor around?
Also, when you read an EDITORIAL on THE HILL don't expect anything other than an OPINION of an A-****.
E
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Reading that NPRChamber (which is a lobbying organisation mr. Velez-Hagan represents) is sponsored by Alphabet, Apple, Paypal, Verizon and Charter (Spectrum) along with Herbalife and a few others!?! is not a strong platform for his opinions to begin with. Btw. calling them National Puerto Rican Chamber of Commerce is a bit of a disgraceful since this lobbyist is astro-turfing as an official government organ in Puerto Rico, which couldn't be further from the truth.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This is amateur stuff
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And let the ISPs regulate access to the Internet to benefit their own profits. I am sure that extra charges to access their customers will do wonders for your members businesses, so long as they want to become employees of large corporations.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Apologies, it was too vague.
Maybe they just had to give the right people enough duck l'orange.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If you repeat a lie often enough and long enough...
--AT&T motto
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Google
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not to worry
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It is amazing how much shite they expect us to believe...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
'Selling out to verizon is good for MY finances, so surely it's good for everyone, right?'
I almost hope they paid him a good amount for his dignity and self-respect to sell out the people struggling with the aftermath of a disaster like that, because I'd hate to think he went cheap.
On the other hand... Fuck him. Selling out those around him for any amount of money is a revolting act, and shows just how contemptible and disgusting a person he really is, such that if he's capable of feeling shame for what he's done it will be compounded by having to face just how little he went for.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I am from Puerto Rico and its the first time we hear of this "organization"
Right now we struggle with basic necessities and communications fail constantly. Net neutrality prevents the ISPs and the telco incumbents from profiteering more than they already are during this national crisis. It borders on treason as it seeks to harm the lives of my people as we are working our butts off trying to rebuild. Last thing wee need is fast lane price gouging schemes and all the other abuse Net Neutrality prevents being legalized so our cable monopoly and shitty wireles providers can further erode the quality of service with their greed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]