Did you somehow skip the third paragraph of my comment before you posted this?
I made it very clear that I don't agree with the methodology through which CDP is identifying pirates.
My point is that Techdirt CONSTANTLY posts articles criticising companies for protecting their rights while excusing the actions of pirates whilst providing ZERO constructive alternatives other than "derp people will pay for quality content"./div>
You're backtracking. In the article you make it clear that you have a problem with CDP going after pirates before you even mention the method through which they're identifying said pirates.
As to the question I posed earlier; how do you propose companies deter and/or punish piracy?
And no, "make content that people want to pay for" is in no way a suitable answer./div>
Um well, you know, um, I actually do read the site and articles like this one are a dime a dozen. I can't recall seeing a single article or post that actually calls out pirates as the criminals they are and applauds or even just supports a company for reasonably defending their rights.
If you can link me to one i'd be more than happy to read it./div>
What a terrible article. You begin by saying that CDP has done the right thing as far as DRM goes, showing that they're not interested in treating paying customers like criminals.
Now that they are going after the ACTUAL criminals, you have a problem with that?
I actually agree with your point that IP addresses is NOT the way to go about this, but you make it clear that you have a problem with that what they are doing in principle which completely baffles me.
If this is unacceptable to you, please explain precisely HOW you propose to deter and/or punish piracy?/div>
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by ashep5.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: From the "we condone piracy" department...
I made it very clear that I don't agree with the methodology through which CDP is identifying pirates.
My point is that Techdirt CONSTANTLY posts articles criticising companies for protecting their rights while excusing the actions of pirates whilst providing ZERO constructive alternatives other than "derp people will pay for quality content"./div>
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: From the "we condone piracy" department...
As to the question I posed earlier; how do you propose companies deter and/or punish piracy?
And no, "make content that people want to pay for" is in no way a suitable answer./div>
Re: Re: Re: Re: From the "we condone piracy" department...
How is getting to play a game that everyone else has to pay $50 not "personal gain"?/div>
Re: Re: From the "we condone piracy" department...
Re: Re: From the "we condone piracy" department...
If you can link me to one i'd be more than happy to read it./div>
From the "we condone piracy" department...
Now that they are going after the ACTUAL criminals, you have a problem with that?
I actually agree with your point that IP addresses is NOT the way to go about this, but you make it clear that you have a problem with that what they are doing in principle which completely baffles me.
If this is unacceptable to you, please explain precisely HOW you propose to deter and/or punish piracy?/div>
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by ashep5.
Submit a story now.
Tools & Services
TwitterFacebook
RSS
Podcast
Research & Reports
Company
About UsAdvertising Policies
Privacy
Contact
Help & FeedbackMedia Kit
Sponsor/Advertise
Submit a Story
More
Copia InstituteInsider Shop
Support Techdirt