[...] how the official describes and uses the account; to whom features of the account are made available; and how others, including government officials and agencies, regard and treat the account.
AOC treats the @AOC account as personal. There may be overlap yes... but she is a Representative. The @RepAOC account is treated as the "official" account. Trumps administration treats his personal account as the official account, not the @POTUS account.
The 2nd left it open to interpretation on a case by case basis ("factâspecific inquiry").
AOC may use the @AOC account as an extension, but has she ever stated that it's an official channel? Wouldn't the official channel be the @RepAOC account?
For Trump, it has been said that his personal account is going to be used for official business (which should make it fall under the Federal rules while he's President yes?). I cannot find the same reference with AOC. So, if this guy is actually represented by her, and she has blocked him on the @RepAOC account, then that block should be removed.
Or if it's stated that the @AOC account will be used as an official account then clear the block there.
If it's your "primary outlet" it will cost you $7.45, but if it's an "additional outlet" it will cost you $9.95. As your primary, you get $2.50 off the $9.95 fee.
The fee isn't a separate item on the bill, just rolled into the overall cost, so it appears you'll be getting a $2.50 credit on the bill.
Our Gov way of helping is to bomb their cities, and then when people are fleeing looking for help, we (the people the Gov represents right?) tell those fleeing they aren't welcome and go back home.
So, what is the solution? Do we the people accept that our foreign policy is causing some of this? Do we continue turn a blind eye when people we (as a country) put in power turn out to be tyrants and do things we think they should be kicked out of power for, just because it's in our _short term_ best interest that they are in power?
Tell me, what is the solution to help them? Overthrow the leader again and hope this next one is going to be better than the last we helped who was a tyrant, but said what we wanted to hear at the time?
Side note: We didn't put Assad into power, but in the 50's? we helped overthrow an elected president with someone who was a tyrant, and he did everything you said about "letting a tyranical government ...," just because the guy _said_ he'd recognize Israel, he was the choice.
Then that guy got overthrown in another coup... and you have this continuing mess.
> We definitely should help, just not in the worst possible way.
So, we should just continue to "help" by bombing their country to rubble, and ignore the displacement caused, and civilians killed by the consequences of these same helpful bombings?
Would this theoretical also bar the viewing of the site on archive.org or a Google cache version? Or would the CFAA fall only on the access of the actual web server?
I would expect the access of the web server, but... now days, who knows: "The content is the same, so it's effectively the same thing!"
The lawsuit was Withdrawn by Sky... Some settlement, Sky deciding they didn't have a case they could make on a Video Game (though I doubt that would deter them)... no idea.
But they *were* sued ... it wasn't the threat of a lawsuit, it *was* a lawsuit. Looking at the date, that was filed about 5-6 months after the VGX awards in 2013 where the first No Man's Sky trailer was shown, and about a month before the 2014 E3 that most people see as the first "real" reveal.
*Note:* The image was from a post online. Wish I knew the original source, but that's the extent I currently have.
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by jms.
Re: Account usage
From my reading it's:
[...] how the official describes and uses the account; to whom features of the account are made available; and how others, including government officials and agencies, regard and treat the account.
AOC treats the @AOC account as personal. There may be overlap yes... but she is a Representative. The @RepAOC account is treated as the "official" account. Trumps administration treats his personal account as the official account, not the @POTUS account.
The 2nd left it open to interpretation on a case by case basis ("factâspecific inquiry").
Account usage
AOC may use the @AOC account as an extension, but has she ever stated that it's an official channel? Wouldn't the official channel be the @RepAOC account?
For Trump, it has been said that his personal account is going to be used for official business (which should make it fall under the Federal rules while he's President yes?). I cannot find the same reference with AOC. So, if this guy is actually represented by her, and she has blocked him on the @RepAOC account, then that block should be removed.
Or if it's stated that the @AOC account will be used as an official account then clear the block there.
Re: Ars Technica had some good coverage on this
If it's your "primary outlet" it will cost you $7.45, but if it's an "additional outlet" it will cost you $9.95. As your primary, you get $2.50 off the $9.95 fee.
The fee isn't a separate item on the bill, just rolled into the overall cost, so it appears you'll be getting a $2.50 credit on the bill.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Missed the point
Our Gov way of helping is to bomb their cities, and then when people are fleeing looking for help, we (the people the Gov represents right?) tell those fleeing they aren't welcome and go back home.
So, what is the solution? Do we the people accept that our foreign policy is causing some of this? Do we continue turn a blind eye when people we (as a country) put in power turn out to be tyrants and do things we think they should be kicked out of power for, just because it's in our _short term_ best interest that they are in power?
Tell me, what is the solution to help them? Overthrow the leader again and hope this next one is going to be better than the last we helped who was a tyrant, but said what we wanted to hear at the time?
Side note: We didn't put Assad into power, but in the 50's? we helped overthrow an elected president with someone who was a tyrant, and he did everything you said about "letting a tyranical government ...," just because the guy _said_ he'd recognize Israel, he was the choice.
Then that guy got overthrown in another coup... and you have this continuing mess.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Missed the point
So, we should just continue to "help" by bombing their country to rubble, and ignore the displacement caused, and civilians killed by the consequences of these same helpful bombings?
Archive
I would expect the access of the web server, but... now days, who knows:
"The content is the same, so it's effectively the same thing!"
Re: Their own fault?
"You want us to pay you to use the word Sky in a Video Game title, when you don't even make games? Are you crazy?"
Okay... maybe there are people who would. But I don't know 'em.
Re: Their own fault?
No, it was...
We're suing you.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ClZ0gZMWQAAfb18.jpg:large
The lawsuit was Withdrawn by Sky... Some settlement, Sky deciding they didn't have a case they could make on a Video Game (though I doubt that would deter them)... no idea.
But they *were* sued ... it wasn't the threat of a lawsuit, it *was* a lawsuit. Looking at the date, that was filed about 5-6 months after the VGX awards in 2013 where the first No Man's Sky trailer was shown, and about a month before the 2014 E3 that most people see as the first "real" reveal.
*Note:* The image was from a post online. Wish I knew the original source, but that's the extent I currently have.
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by jms.
Submit a story now.
Tools & Services
TwitterFacebook
RSS
Podcast
Research & Reports
Company
About UsAdvertising Policies
Privacy
Contact
Help & FeedbackMedia Kit
Sponsor/Advertise
Submit a Story
More
Copia InstituteInsider Shop
Support Techdirt