But, they aren't discriminating against CNN's viewpoints, they are addressing a reporter that should had been escorted out right after he was asked 3 times to sit down and be quiet.
As I posted, CNN could easily send another reporter to get their viewpoints. They are not entitled to send Jim, just because that is who they want to send./div>
Maybe, I am missing something but what law is it that says Jim Acosta is entitled to enter the WH?
I would understand if the WH said that CNN reporters can't enter, but why can't they stop a single person from doing so? The PRESS is not Jim Acosta, it is the organization he works for and reports for. They can easily send someone else in there to do the same job he was doing and to get the same "press" he was getting.
BTW, the content of his questioning had absolutely nothing to do with his removal. It is the same BS content that CNN continues with. He was asked numerous times to sit down and be quiet after he asked and Trump responded to him the first time. He rudely continued on after multiple request, even after the microphone was actually taken from him. He should have been removed immediately after he had to be asked a 3rd time to sit down and be quiet./div>
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by Skippy.
Re: I don't see any problems for Ajit Pai ahead
Second, the courts are yet to determine if the FCC could actually relinquish the authority it is trying to relinquish to the FTC.
Third, as noted in the article, location data still falls under the authority of the FCC.
Lastly, Pai is a tool that does not serve the people of the US and needs to be removed from his position./div>
Re:
As I posted, CNN could easily send another reporter to get their viewpoints. They are not entitled to send Jim, just because that is who they want to send./div>
What?
I would understand if the WH said that CNN reporters can't enter, but why can't they stop a single person from doing so? The PRESS is not Jim Acosta, it is the organization he works for and reports for. They can easily send someone else in there to do the same job he was doing and to get the same "press" he was getting.
BTW, the content of his questioning had absolutely nothing to do with his removal. It is the same BS content that CNN continues with. He was asked numerous times to sit down and be quiet after he asked and Trump responded to him the first time. He rudely continued on after multiple request, even after the microphone was actually taken from him. He should have been removed immediately after he had to be asked a 3rd time to sit down and be quiet./div>
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by Skippy.
Submit a story now.
Tools & Services
TwitterFacebook
RSS
Podcast
Research & Reports
Company
About UsAdvertising Policies
Privacy
Contact
Help & FeedbackMedia Kit
Sponsor/Advertise
Submit a Story
More
Copia InstituteInsider Shop
Support Techdirt