The eejit’s Comments

• Nov 22nd, 2012 @ 4:28am

  Re:

  on SurfTheChannel Founder Gets Extra Jail Time For Revealing Documents That Raised Questions About His Conviction
  In the UK, sure. It takes a crapton less money than stealing fromt he public, though.
• Nov 22nd, 2012 @ 2:57am

  Re: Two Words

  on Company Sues Kickstarter Over 3D Printer Patent, Maligns 'Hackers And Makers'
  Moreover, why patent a 20-year-old process?
  
  Because that'w ehre the money lies.
• Nov 22nd, 2012 @ 2:56am

  Re:

  on Expose Blatant Security Hole From AT&T... Face Five Years In Jail
  I'm not sure you understand the difference between talk and action,
• Nov 22nd, 2012 @ 12:34am

  Re: Re:

  on 40 Years Ago The Supreme Court Effectively Banned Software Patents; Remember That?
  I love the fact that he posted them, with no change in, well, anything, and yet he is the one who must be right. ALWAYS.
• Nov 22nd, 2012 @ 12:33am

  Re:

  on One Step Closer To Real Medical Tech Breakthrough... If Immigration Law Doesn't Get In The Way
  And I'm pretty sure Cambridge would be willing to host them.
• Nov 21st, 2012 @ 7:33am

  Re: Using "statistics" as propaganda.

  on Supplying The Missing Ingredient In Evidence-Based Policymaking: Evidence
  I think we found someone who has no concept of morality, history or, well, anything approaching sanity.
• Nov 20th, 2012 @ 11:42pm

  Re: Reverse Streisand Effect

  on Lord McAlpine, Wronged By BBC, Demands 10,000 People On Twitter Pay Up
  Here's the thing, though: the person it was claimed that he'd abused that made the biggest headlines had said it was a case of mistaken identity.
  
  I think there's marginally more fo a case here than there has been in pretty much any other case like this we've seen so far. I still don't think it would get anywhere, but I think that this is one where the case is more "correct".
• Nov 20th, 2012 @ 12:40pm

  Re:

  on Patrick Leahy Ready To Cave To Law Enforcement: Has ECPA Reform Amendment To Include Loopholes For Warrantless Spying
  Yes, because if they don't have it, then the RIAA won't be able to steal your bank details so that you can pay them 1560 times for wtaching The Star Wars Trek.
• Nov 20th, 2012 @ 5:04am

  Re: PAY YUR FUCKING DEBTS

  on Copyright Hardliners Adapt 'Copyright Reform' Language; They Just Mean In The Other Direction
  They can't. That would require making content.
• Nov 19th, 2012 @ 2:01pm

  Re: Re: Re:

  on App Developer Hijacks Customer Twitter Accounts In An Attempt To Shame Pirates
  Well, at least they didn't get to the "Summon Cthuloid Jesus" step.
• Nov 19th, 2012 @ 12:58pm

  Re: Re:

  on App Developer Hijacks Customer Twitter Accounts In An Attempt To Shame Pirates
  Step 1) Download a legitimate product
  Steps 2-11) ???
  Step 12) STOP RIGHT THERE, CRIMINAL SCUM!
• Nov 19th, 2012 @ 12:10pm

  Re: Re: Re:

  on Don't Let Retraction Distract From The Simple Fact: GOP Copyright Policy Brief Was Brilliant
  I'm not anti-copyright; I'm anti-privilege.
  
  Get it right.
• Nov 19th, 2012 @ 10:59am

  Re: Re: Re:

  on Samsung Wants To See The Details Of Apple's HTC Settlement
  I cite Morgan freeman as prior art.
• Nov 19th, 2012 @ 9:32am

  Re:

  on Yes, A Domain Name Can Be Protected By The First Amendment
  Try telling that to the DoJ.
• Nov 19th, 2012 @ 9:30am

  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

  on Yes, A Domain Name Can Be Protected By The First Amendment
  So, please remind me again why people should obey proprietary "rights" over native "rights".
  
  Moreover, your "Harry Potter" example has already been done. Investigaitn "agents" simply sent a blind DMCa notice in place of, y'know, talking to their marketing department.
• Nov 18th, 2012 @ 5:28am

  Re: Re: Re: Just keep doing what we've done best.

  on That Was Fast: Hollywood Already Browbeat The Republicans Into Retracting Report On Copyright Reform
  Dude, if anyone here was a freehadist, you'd be dead under the weight of billions of free music files that are perfectly legal.
• Nov 18th, 2012 @ 5:23am

  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Stand Firm

  on That Was Fast: Hollywood Already Browbeat The Republicans Into Retracting Report On Copyright Reform
  ...So why is it signed by the RSC Chairman and subcommittee members? Or is everyone a Google shill in the GOP?
• Nov 18th, 2012 @ 5:20am

  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

  on That Was Fast: Hollywood Already Browbeat The Republicans Into Retracting Report On Copyright Reform
  No, it really wasn't. Go look up your history. Then come back. Copyright is a purely mercantilist concept, and anyone saying otherwise is literally an ignoramus who should be ignored.
  
  Moreover, "because it's the LAW!!!" is not a valid argument either. Remember the "Rule of Thumb"? Or the law saying that you could own a person?
• Nov 17th, 2012 @ 12:21pm

  Re:

  on Unsealed Megaupload Seizure Warrants Reveal Use Of Flawed Logic... And An 'Undercover Computer'
  Because the Twihards in the DoJ wanted sparkly Dotcom.
• Nov 17th, 2012 @ 12:17pm

  Re: I couldn't resist...

  on Unsealed Megaupload Seizure Warrants Reveal Use Of Flawed Logic... And An 'Undercover Computer'
  No, it came pre-loaded with BLU software.

More comments from The eejit >>