I love how on the About Us page of ClevGuard, there's this gem "Privacy of your data was our prime concern while designing the product, and we've ensured that your data stay with you, and not us."
If this was their prime concern, what the hell does that say about how the rest of the software is designed?
look at how many people still believe in various religions. If you can believe in some big cosmic muffin that "has a plan for your life", how much easier is it to believe that someone is making bad videos to trick children into killing themselves.
I'd start building a list of websites that are native European, and when this goes into affect, start posting posting a ton of content to those sites via TOR. Since filters are so shitty, a bet a ton will get thru whatever they have in place, and when half the native websites go down, maybe THEN they will listen.
Right now, Duckduckgo's first link is a Wikipedia article about Thomas Goolnik that has all the gorey details about Goolnik's problems with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois and the FTC, and subsequent uses of RTBF requests.
Interestingly (or not so, if you know how Duckduckgo actually produces search results), it's also the first link on Google. So if Goolnik is trying to hide his shadey history, he might try having a swing at that./div>
is there no law/rule that would punish a lawyer for bringing the same failed lawsuit over and over again. I mean, can't a judge see that this is the fourth such lawsuit that has been dismissed, and say "You guys suck. Give me your licenses!"
Sure, and for every one of me there are hundreds who buy all the lies, and think that it's TechDirt and me who are lying. The lack of accountability is what allows politicians (and Presidents) to lie with impunity./div>
So why bother to require a public comment period if their decision is only supposed to be based on technical and economic analysis? And were not most of the comments data in both of those analysis? And why am I asking someone who is obviously a shill?/div>
When I was young (granted, it was when dinosaurs ruled the earth) we were taught that "Respect is earned, not given." LEOs seem to not believe this./div>
Did this guy (Bliss) study under John Steele?
Sounds like he would have been right at home at Prenda.
/div>Privacy of Your Data
I love how on the About Us page of ClevGuard, there's this gem "Privacy of your data was our prime concern while designing the product, and we've ensured that your data stay with you, and not us."
If this was their prime concern, what the hell does that say about how the rest of the software is designed?
/div>Re:
nauseating
/div>The REAL reason there was "no responsive records"
there wasn't any seizures. It was just a PR plug to try and help rehabilitate ICE's image among the uninformed. We don't buy it, but Fox News will.
/div>Of course we are susceptible to bullshit
look at how many people still believe in various religions. If you can believe in some big cosmic muffin that "has a plan for your life", how much easier is it to believe that someone is making bad videos to trick children into killing themselves.
/div>Re: I don’t live in Chicago, but it is disgusting to behold
Nice try, comrade.
/div>You know, if I was an evil man
I'd start building a list of websites that are native European, and when this goes into affect, start posting posting a ton of content to those sites via TOR. Since filters are so shitty, a bet a ton will get thru whatever they have in place, and when half the native websites go down, maybe THEN they will listen.
<only about half kidding>
/div>Re: Re: Not forgetting, but don't really care too much
Interestingly (or not so, if you know how Duckduckgo actually produces search results), it's also the first link on Google. So if Goolnik is trying to hide his shadey history, he might try having a swing at that./div>
i was just going to ask that
Just wonderin'/div>
Re: Re:
Re: Re: Re: tl;dr
Simple formulas
Robert Barnes =/ Good Lawyer
Probably would be funnier if I knew where the "not equal" key was./div>
Re: Liberal hysteria
So why bother to require a public comment period if their decision is only supposed to be based on technical and economic analysis? And were not most of the comments data in both of those analysis? And why am I asking someone who is obviously a shill?/div>
Re: Re: Censored! Yeah, it's a crime how outlaws don't get protected!
Re: Re:
(untitled comment)
FTFY/div>
Re: Re: Re: Short answer: no.
Re:
Re:
Re: Re: Top 10% of what?
More comments from Dirkmaster >>
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by Dirkmaster.
Submit a story now.
Tools & Services
TwitterFacebook
RSS
Podcast
Research & Reports
Company
About UsAdvertising Policies
Privacy
Contact
Help & FeedbackMedia Kit
Sponsor/Advertise
Submit a Story
More
Copia InstituteInsider Shop
Support Techdirt