i had this with CA. submitted docs said it would be about 6 hours for a live person to review and to please hold. then at just under 6 hours, was told my docs had an issue and resubmit then they dropped the connection. NO opportunity to fix on the spot and that live person never showed up. I resubmitted and was told i had to wait another 7 hours...which worked and the guy told me the reason i was rejected before was because the photo of my BC was slightly grey in the corner and they couldn't read the strip or micro text that was all the way around. It was literally just an inch of slightly grey area but the entire rest of the doc, including seal was there.
however if she had put it on a judges car and gotten the same results, that would have been hilarious.
Your honor she went to all these high crime events.
No I didn't, it was on the judges car.
um case dismissed... thats lunch bye......
LOL, I love how you are so obsessed with this site and it's people that rather than discuss the actual article, you attack the people for not posting enough. Would you add my account to your love list as well since I read daily but post rarely? That would make me happy and I hope it fills your heart with joy as well.
but it does work...for the politicians. There wasn't a need to convince them, they saw it first hand. Give tax dollars to the corporations and a portion of the money trickles back to the politicians via the lobbyists and donations.
Just be aware that the Network+ and Security+ are for the old versions. (Security+ was updated to 501 in Oct 2017 and Network+ was updated to N10-007 in Mar 2018.) Granted, most of the material will be the same but FYI.
that it is. and since the vocal citizenry will demand their right to own every type of gun ever made, then the police must always be one step above - and the coffers get bigger.
This is the thing that always gets me. We hear reports that our troops on the lines don't have enough quality equipment be it food, weapons and armor, vehicles, etc, so we must buy more but then we sell "surplus" to the cops. Is this truly surplus or is this just a middleman deal? The military buys the gear that is wanted to militarize the domestic ground forces and passes it on? Granted, I used to think such conspiracies were not worth the time but the more and more I see and read about our entire government and the games they play, there are days I start to wonder. Then again it may be as simple as "If we don't spend the department budget, they will cut the budget and we can always just sell it off to the cops."
Either way, Sessions is a dangerous person to have in this position.
That would be assuming he took it on his own volition. Do you have proof of this? More importantly, did the cops have proof of this upon pickup or did they just assume he did without considering that he may have been a victim of someone slipping it to him? I mean if we follow your logic the root cause of this is that his parents let him out in the world, or had a son, or had sex, or met, ...
However root cause or not, this is police brutality and they should be held to a higher standard - no matter how hard their job may be.
Actually, this makes me wonder if there was a third scenario. He was one of their "puppet terrorists" they were grooming for "attaboy" media disclosure and "look we are doing something" kangaroo court and it got away from them.
Which makes the scenario gross negligence rather than clueless.
I whitelisted Techdirt when you adjusted the layout a while back. This is something other sites could take note of. Decent size (not huge popups that overshadow what I came for,) related or on-topic (most of the ads I see are all tech related including WGU with their awesome IT programs. Go Night Owls!) and, as mentioned by previous posters, aren't loud or jarring. There are few other sites that are that considerate so thank you for respecting your readers.
He steered a person into the TSA private screening booth and no one questioned him in the first place? How did he get around to it? Of course the TSA is going to take over the investigation. The shirt color and slacks things works at Best Buy; it should not work at a security checkpoint, even if it is only designed to deter lowest common denominator problems.
Interesting wording though for the Chief: Our department will not arrest civilians if they audio-record any on-duty police officers in a public place
So does this mean that they will arrest you if you film them in a private business? or your home? While this is probably over analyzing, this guy does seem to give words a twist when he speaks. (Reference his previous statement: "He honestly thought he was OK to do it, so now if he continues to do it, I can’t tell you that he certainly won’t be arrested.”
Buy stock of light bulb company via the subsidiary of their shell company. Promote said Company's light bulbs as brighter thus allowing for better security from terrorists and child molesters. Also fight for local light bulb installer union and how the LED consortium is trying to take away good American jobs,
Then after all the lobbying, fighting, delaying tactics, and closed door trade agreements are done: we pay 16.63 million for a guy with a top secret security clearance to come in and screw in a light bulb.
actually - you violated the terms:
12.3 You may not and may not permit others to do any of the following things in relation to any book or extract:
print-on-demand or copy or burn the book or extract to a device whose principal function is to act as a storage device, for example, a CD/DVD or USB stick;
I didn't see anything about them having to pay back and money made while the ads run. In reality, if rumblefish did this with a bunch of vids that weren't really theirs and only half of the owners stopped them by arguing RF would still make quite a bit of change wouldn't they? Maybe that was their plan? (I get that they won't make a ton on ads but I could see where it would all add up if they did this a lot.
hate them
i had this with CA. submitted docs said it would be about 6 hours for a live person to review and to please hold. then at just under 6 hours, was told my docs had an issue and resubmit then they dropped the connection. NO opportunity to fix on the spot and that live person never showed up. I resubmitted and was told i had to wait another 7 hours...which worked and the guy told me the reason i was rejected before was because the photo of my BC was slightly grey in the corner and they couldn't read the strip or micro text that was all the way around. It was literally just an inch of slightly grey area but the entire rest of the doc, including seal was there.
Re: Re: The possibilities are endless
however if she had put it on a judges car and gotten the same results, that would have been hilarious.
Your honor she went to all these high crime events.
No I didn't, it was on the judges car.
um case dismissed... thats lunch bye......
Link broken
Just a note that the link to reuters appears to add a quote at the end and doesn't resolve, without the quote it does.
(untitled comment)
"You either die a hero, or you live long enough to see yourself become the villain."
Re: Re: Re: UDP is the new bad guy?
LOL, I love how you are so obsessed with this site and it's people that rather than discuss the actual article, you attack the people for not posting enough. Would you add my account to your love list as well since I read daily but post rarely? That would make me happy and I hope it fills your heart with joy as well.
Re: Re: Re: Trickle down -- Another 'Dirt-napper! 6 comments a y
Re: Trickle down
(untitled comment)
Re: Re: Define Surplus
Define Surplus
Either way, Sessions is a dangerous person to have in this position.
Re:
However root cause or not, this is police brutality and they should be held to a higher standard - no matter how hard their job may be.
Re:
Which makes the scenario gross negligence rather than clueless.
unobtrusive ads
Wait aren't we missing a big chunk here
Re: Wait wait wait...
he couldn't positively identify whether he had the right person
at an Anaheim elementary school
This ICE agent should be removed and their gun credentials revoked permanently as they failed the basic weapon rules.
Chief Speaks
Our department will not arrest civilians if they audio-record any on-duty police officers in a public place
So does this mean that they will arrest you if you film them in a private business? or your home? While this is probably over analyzing, this guy does seem to give words a twist when he speaks. (Reference his previous statement: "He honestly thought he was OK to do it, so now if he continues to do it, I can’t tell you that he certainly won’t be arrested.”
Re: Re: Re:
Then after all the lobbying, fighting, delaying tactics, and closed door trade agreements are done: we pay 16.63 million for a guy with a top secret security clearance to come in and screw in a light bulb.
Re: Bought the collection this morning
12.3 You may not and may not permit others to do any of the following things in relation to any book or extract:
print-on-demand or copy or burn the book or extract to a device whose principal function is to act as a storage device, for example, a CD/DVD or USB stick;
Payment
Re: Re:
More comments from drkkgt >>
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by drkkgt.
Submit a story now.
Tools & Services
TwitterFacebook
RSS
Podcast
Research & Reports
Company
About UsAdvertising Policies
Privacy
Contact
Help & FeedbackMedia Kit
Sponsor/Advertise
Submit a Story
More
Copia InstituteInsider Shop
Support Techdirt