I totally agree - the new power is a way of circumventing public backlash on a 3 strikes policy. In fact, in many ways I think this is far worse as it is unclear and gives too much power to one of the UK's most corrupt politicians.
My point was just that we should be careful when discussing the 'three strikes clause' as it technically doesn't exist.
I don't want to give Labour the ability to dismiss our arguments based on 'there is no 3 strikes clause'./div>
Re: Re: PUNK!
PUNK!
I hate when people spam their own websites in comments though, so unless anyone specifically wants to see it, I'm not going to write the name or url.
In any case, total legend. I agree 100%./div>
Re: Re: Maybe I'm wrong...
My point was just that we should be careful when discussing the 'three strikes clause' as it technically doesn't exist.
I don't want to give Labour the ability to dismiss our arguments based on 'there is no 3 strikes clause'./div>
Maybe I'm wrong...
I thought there was only a power for Mandy to implement 'technical measures' at a later date if necessary./div>
LawPUNK’s Submitted Stories.
Submit a story now.
Tools & Services
TwitterFacebook
RSS
Podcast
Research & Reports
Company
About UsAdvertising Policies
Privacy
Contact
Help & FeedbackMedia Kit
Sponsor/Advertise
Submit a Story
More
Copia InstituteInsider Shop
Support Techdirt