jen’s Comments

• Jun 27th, 2014 @ 7:33am

  Re: collection agency

  on KlearGear Told To Pay $306,750 For Bogus Attempt To Shakedown Customer For Bad Review
  the debt collection agency was named in the original lawsuit as one of the defendants. however, UNLIKE kleargear, they stepped up and responded. we basically told them "tell the credit bureaus this debt is false, turn over everything you have on kleargear's whereabouts, or you get sued too." fortunately, they did the right thing and realized the debt was bogus. they were very helpful in cleaning up john's credit report.
  
  since they came through, we dropped them from the suit and continued after kleargear for their bad actions.
• Jun 27th, 2014 @ 7:30am

  Re: Re: track them identify them

  on KlearGear Told To Pay $306,750 For Bogus Attempt To Shakedown Customer For Bad Review
  that option has already come up. :)
  
  honestly, we've got several options on collections, and public citizens will be figuring out how best to handle the next steps.
• Dec 22nd, 2013 @ 5:48pm

  Re: Have they gone

  on KlearGear Sued For Destroying The Credit Of A Couple Who Wrote A Negative Review
  the non-disparagement clause disappeared the day after the original KUTV2 article aired.
• Nov 27th, 2013 @ 6:27pm

  Re: Where is the clause?

  on Public Citizen Suing On Behalf Of Customers Whose Credit Was Ruined By KlearGear's $3,500 'Bad Review' Fee
  the clause was taken down a day or two after the original news story from KUTV2 aired.