The point of the article is about scope creep. Surveillance orginally intended for TFL is now distributed to police and other agencies. That wasn't the original aim; so to do so is wrong. Or maybe it was the original aim and they just lied to the public (for their own protection of course)/div>
Sadly true. One wonders what the legislation defining 'troll' will look like. It's about as daft as saying something is "on-the internet". Strictly speaking, the interweb has nothing 'on it' for very long ... it's just a conduit/div>
You could always really frustrate the feds by not having an idiotPhone in the first place. Between the backdoors, the DRM, the camera, the microphone and the GPS you couldn't possibly be expecting privacy anyway./div>
Risk Assessment 101: - Who are you hiding data from? The government, your wife or your mom?
- How much of your data really needs to be encrypted? It'll be a small subset of all the bytes you own. In which case you can probably concoct your own disguise for it./div>
You mean you want to drive your OWN car? You don't want Google, Intel or the government firmware navigating you? Why? What have you got to hide?? Where are your going that manual control is necessary??? You are clearly a terrorist!!! :-//div>
So if I wear Google Glasses and stare at a the trademark on a Coke can will the feds crash tackle me? God forbid I should watch 22 seconds of CBS News in a storefront window!/div>
If abuse of NSA systems is not possible they are the only branch of government to achieve uptopia.
Thousands of Medicare, tax, social security and transport records are trawlled by government employees for 'less than professional' reasons every year. (eg: checking up on your ex-wife's new partner)/div>
Creeped Out
That wasn't the original aim; so to do so is wrong. Or maybe it was the original aim and they just lied to the public (for their own protection of course)/div>
Re: Re: Re: Re: Troll bad, law good, me hungry
It's about as daft as saying something is "on-the internet". Strictly speaking, the interweb has nothing 'on it' for very long ... it's just a conduit/div>
FFS
Protect Who
Phone Encryption
Between the backdoors, the DRM, the camera, the microphone and the GPS you couldn't possibly be expecting privacy anyway./div>
Core Business
What Do You Seek
Risk Assessment 101:
- Who are you hiding data from? The government, your wife or your mom?
- How much of your data really needs to be encrypted? It'll be a small subset of all the bytes you own. In which case you can probably concoct your own disguise for it./div>
(untitled comment)
Google Cars (as Lleuadci)
Responsibility
Where does it end?
God forbid I should watch 22 seconds of CBS News in a storefront window!/div>
Fair Enough
Within Policy (as Lleud Ci)
What did he consider amongst these 'all things'? Career, Peer Pressure, Groupthink?/div>
Not possible
Thousands of Medicare, tax, social security and transport records are trawlled by government employees for 'less than professional' reasons every year. (eg: checking up on your ex-wife's new partner)/div>
Silence is compliance
DDoS
Because of the tools used, DDoS is more akin to disrupting telecommunication services than individuals causing congestion.
Neither does the "protest" tag doesn't negate "law". Breaking one law to protest another doesn't endear people to the cause albeit worthy./div>
Ingredients
For example, up to 12% permeate fluid being added to so-called fresh milk.
And for those with allergies, complete declaration of additives. eg: Sulfites < 50ppm./div>
Constitutional Rights (as The Moon Dog)
Having said that, turnabout is fair play.
If the authorities can record, you should be able to./div>
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by Lleuad Ci.
Submit a story now.
Tools & Services
TwitterFacebook
RSS
Podcast
Research & Reports
Company
About UsAdvertising Policies
Privacy
Contact
Help & FeedbackMedia Kit
Sponsor/Advertise
Submit a Story
More
Copia InstituteInsider Shop
Support Techdirt