Speaking as a cancer survivor, I cannot say strongly enough ... F**K THAT GUY AND ALL SNAKE-OIL CHARLATANS!
Not only should this be thrown out, but he should have to pay for every Google lawyer, executive, secretary, and mailboy that dealt with this! Also, he should have to pay for every judge, clerk, and bailiff that got near this 'suit'!
People like him do real harm to the vulnerable cancer patients desperate, or ignorant, enough to buy into it.
Blockquote Defendants’ unauthorized access of a protected computer has caused damage and is continuing to cause damage to Southwest, including loss arising from the cost of responding to and investigating Defendants’ unauthorized access, which has amounted in an aggregated loss of at least $5,000 during a one-year period.
If the site only launched November (2 months ago), how can they have a one-year aggregated loss?
Also, how is this any different that TripIt Pro, that checks for lower fares?
As a cancer survivor (Stage 3 colorectal), currently in chemo, these 'natruopaths' prey on people's vulnerability and steal money from them. I've been through radiation and 2x surgeries, I'm on my way to being able to live the rest of my natural (pun intended) life. Sadly, I fear many of the victims will not./div>
As may be. I was not referring to the TOS, but to ADT's response on Twitter.
Tim specifically calls out ADT's explanation/apology (and linked to the tweet with the graphic) then did a blockquote of that explanation/apology. The blockquote does not correctly quote what ADT said. It's minor, I know, but what's in Tim's article is not correct./div>
How many times, in the past, has a SDCC traveler claimed that priceless comics were stolen from their checked luggage? I don't know, but I'm a cynic that believes the number is large enough, and the dollar amounts large enough, for United to BAN comics from checked luggage themselves. The added twist, is that United is blaming TSA for it instead of saying "we're tired of paying out for (likely) false loss claims."/div>
Let us not forget the company begging for permission to talk to the public about a massive spying operation INTENTIONALLY kept its own security department in the blind when it had actually implemented one./div>
text message: IMPORTANT INFOMRATION!!!111
"I am with dpartment of IRS. You owe taxes. Pay USD$4239 in Amazon gift card to..."
report spam
/div>delete
block sender
PS:
Govern yourself accordingly.
/div>Dictionary Definitions
Lawyers using dictionary definitions in bumptious defamation threats should be considered "literal feces".
/div>Missed the target
I would think FyreTV would have a better case against Fyre Festival, TBH.
/div>(untitled comment)
Fuck Roane! And fuck QI in general and totality!
/div>Autoplay
Personally, I'd be FOR banning autoplay, especially ads. Penalty should be dragging and quartering for the perpetrators.
/div>uh ... maybe re-word
At least here in California, it is illegal to drive with headphones. You may want to change the wording away from "do your daily commute".
/div>Also ...
.... in other news .... it takes 4 months for a vehicle put on the 'hot list' to be 'found' by police. :rollseyes:
/div>(untitled comment)
Not only should this be thrown out, but he should have to pay for every Google lawyer, executive, secretary, and mailboy that dealt with this! Also, he should have to pay for every judge, clerk, and bailiff that got near this 'suit'!
People like him do real harm to the vulnerable cancer patients desperate, or ignorant, enough to buy into it.
May he rot in whatever hell he believes in./div>
Is a time-machine involved?
If the site only launched November (2 months ago), how can they have a one-year aggregated loss?
Also, how is this any different that TripIt Pro, that checks for lower fares?
/div>This pisses me off!
(untitled comment)
Re:
Re: Re: Small correction
Tim specifically calls out ADT's explanation/apology (and linked to the tweet with the graphic) then did a blockquote of that explanation/apology. The blockquote does not correctly quote what ADT said. It's minor, I know, but what's in Tim's article is not correct./div>
Small correction
(untitled comment)
Well, JLVD is representing himself, so the math checks out!/div>
Typo or new verb?
""net neutrality" should apple to edge companies"
Is 'apple' a new verb, or should that be 'apply'? ;-)
/div>CYA, but pass the blame
How many times, in the past, has a SDCC traveler claimed that priceless comics were stolen from their checked luggage? I don't know, but I'm a cynic that believes the number is large enough, and the dollar amounts large enough, for United to BAN comics from checked luggage themselves. The added twist, is that United is blaming TSA for it instead of saying "we're tired of paying out for (likely) false loss claims."/div>
My irony meter got broke .... again!
(untitled comment)
More comments from radarmonkey >>
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by radarmonkey.
Submit a story now.
Tools & Services
TwitterFacebook
RSS
Podcast
Research & Reports
Company
About UsAdvertising Policies
Privacy
Contact
Help & FeedbackMedia Kit
Sponsor/Advertise
Submit a Story
More
Copia InstituteInsider Shop
Support Techdirt