Yahoo Asks James Clapper To Please Let It Talk About The Email Scanning It Did For The Government
from the 'it-already-sucks-enough-to-be-us' dept
After spending several days basking in the fiery glow of negative press (and seeing potential investors walk away from buying the company), Yahoo is asking the government to please please let it talk about the spying it apparently performed for the NSA or FBI.
Yahoo sent a letter to National Intelligence director James Clapper on Wednesday urging the U.S. government to provide clearer information to citizens on national security demands for user data.
Yahoo’s letter called for intelligence groups to confirm if future reported demands for data are real, and if they are, declassify them with context for the public.
Pots, kettles, and other analogous materials are rendered incomprehensible in its statement, which involves a media company implicitly criticizing other media companies.
In a letter today to James Clapper, Director of National Intelligence (DNI), Yahoo is formally urging that the U.S. government provide its citizens with clarification around national security orders they issue to internet companies to obtain user data.
While the letter makes specific reference to recent allegations against Yahoo, it is intended to set a stronger precedent of transparency for our users and all citizens who could be affected by government requests for user data. As we’ve said before, recent press reports have been misleading; the mail scanning described in the article does not exist on our systems.
"Does not exist" is not nearly the same thing as "did not exist." This means Yahoo is no longer scanning emails in this fashion, not that it never performed this scanning.
The letter does make a good point about transparency. Currently, Yahoo is unable to defend itself against any allegations because it is likely under a gag order. Yahoo would like Clapper's office to share in the public pain, especially since it had a problem sharing in the communications gathered on its behalf by the email provider.
Public embarrassment or not, Clapper's office is probably not rushing through a declassification review of this Section 702 FISA order. It could still be months or years before the government produces this document and/or allows Yahoo to speak openly about its email scanning program.
Perhaps recognizing that a displeased letter to the ODNI doesn't create much leverage, the company appears to be making this a global issue, rather than simply a domestic one. Marcy Wheeler points out that the letter mentions Yahoo's global reach and users several times and namechecks the EU's Privacy Shield agreement. This may be the key that loosens the Intelligence Community's Glomarred lips.
But there’s another reason why Clapper’s office — or rather ODNI General Counsel Bob Litt — may be so quiet.
Litt is the one who made many of the representations about US spying to authorities here [Wheeler is in Europe at the moment]. Someone — Litt, if he’s still around for a hearing that may take place under President Hillary — may also need to go testify under oath in an Irish court in conjunction with a lawsuit there. Whoever testifies will be asked about the kinds of surveillance implicating European users the government makes US companies do.
In other words, Bob Litt is the one who made certain representations to the European authorities. And now some of those same people are asking questions about how this scan complies with the terms Litt laid out.
Which makes his silence all the more instructive.
Someone's going to have to start talking about Yahoo's email scanning program soon. Yahoo obviously can't, which means the ODNI is going to have to address this on someone else's timetable. We already have US legislators demanding answers. European politicians are already unhappy about the apparent breach of the Privacy Shield Agreement. If the ODNI continues to avoid the issue, all it will be doing is letting a private company take the fall for its possible overreach.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: email, gag order, james clapper, mass surveillance, nsa, scanning, surveillance
Companies: yahoo
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
This is just a bunch of hand waving ..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I imagine "national security" would prevail as it always does. It even trumps The Constitution.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I reiterate my earlier comment: just how much damage these programs have caused financially compared to the 'threats' they should be mitigating (terrorism et al)? My bet is that the US has lost tons of money already because of the excesses.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Does Yahoo have a secret room like AT&T?
If so, technically true.
It's not their systems, it's the NSA's.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: you got me !
i thought this was some fine satire, until i saw the moniker...
you are beyond satire, whatevs...
bot, i wonder ? ? ?
one of a hundred pseudonyms by some gummint kontractor spoofing the commentard ? ? ?
only the shadow gummint knows...
hee hee hee
ho ho ho
ha ha ha
ak ak ak
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: you got me !
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Of course people are just too stupid to realize they cannot have any rights when it comes to fighting terrorism. Otherwise what would have been the point of the government funding and setting up all those terrorist attacks if they didn't get the removal of basic rights as a result.
Step 1: you create a problem
Step 2: you talk about how horrible said problem is
Step 3: you throw anyone used to create said problem under the bus, and fix it usually at the expense of civil liberties and basic rights that are now gone.
Step 4: Enjoy ruling your new police state free of pesky things like opposite opinions, or people thinking they can stand up to you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
My irony meter got broke .... again!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: My irony meter got broke .... again!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: My irony meter got broke .... again!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Obviously
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"In this fashion"
Not in exactly this fashion. One minor reporting error would let Yahoo legitimately make this statement.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Actually I think "on our systems" is the key part. It is probably a government supplied box "connected" to their systems.
Do you really think that government had a dragnet email reading system up and somehow let it go? They would never do that.
Look at what it took to stop them using general warrants last time. Power is taken..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dear Mr. Clapper,
Your humble boy-toy,
--Yahoo!, Inc.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Direct link
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Oh noes, how terrible...
If the ODNI continues to avoid the issue, all it will be doing is letting a private company take the fall for its possible overreach.
And I've no doubt that the thought of a private company going under to cover for their actions has everyone in the government up at night, clutching their bedsheets in horror at the thought of what they've done.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Oh noes, how terrible...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
RE: "In this fashion"
First:
...recent press reports have been misleading...
doesn't say the reports are wrong, only that they're misleading.
Second:
...the mail scanning described in the article does not exist on our systems.
does not deny that email scanning is (or was) taking place - it only denies that it's not being done as described in the article.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: RE: "In this fashion"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yahoo Technical Helpline Number
If you are also Yahoo user then you can visit here for improving your knowledge about Yahoo.
Thank you for posting these type of informative thing about Yahoo.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
People Creating Yahoo Account
It has been cleared this all was only rumours, Yahoo still getting so many requests for creating New Mail account. Creating Yahoo Mail is very easy with lots advanced benefits and 24*7 Support.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]