|
About raging.alcoholic
I write a blog on alcoholism. It is sort of a laymans dictionary. If you want to know if you are an alcholic, or how to help an alcoholic, etc. Raging Alcoholic is a good place to start. http://ragingalcoholic.com I started this when I first started getting sober. I saw that no one was serving this niche and began to try. It will answer about 80% of the question people have on alcoholism. I link out to other recognized authorities for the really in-depth stuff.
|
Re:
I am going to support this. I don't want to have to say I could of helped. I want to be able to say I did help./div>
family harmony (as Mark Noo)
e.g. Suzy(sister) tells Johnny (brother) she is going to kill him and then hits him.
If they were not brother and sister this would be the tort of both assault and battery.
However, courts don't allow for this for the obvious reason that lawsuits upset family harmony.
There is no way to know what they are going to do here but I assume they will come up with some sort of similar ruling.
The divorce case is something different. Family harmony is already destroyed./div>
(untitled comment) (as Mark Noo)
You have to give any information up that you have control over.
These rules help us do everything from collecting taxed to closing down sites with child pornography.
If the rules of another government do not forbid your giving the information up, then the court can compel you. If the foreign countries rules do forbid it, than you cannot be compelled because it is beyond your control. The court isn't going to require you to break laws, treaties, etc.
That is what I remember from intellectual property. A real lawyer can probably clear up the matter in a paragraph or two.
We do not want people in American committing crimes and havign a sort of "immunity" because they store their information in another country.
We have treaties that allow for this type of thing with most of the countries we trade with.
We can extradite criminals from most of those countries to. e.g. a criminal who flees to Canada can frustrate extradition if the United States penalty is death. If not, the Canadians will usually hand them right over.
I feel your frustration with the American government. They cannot keep their own house in order, why do they get to tell other people what to do? I don't blame you but this is a good rule. We don't want justice prevented because their server is in another country.
If they have a right to write things to a server in a foreign country than they have a right to retrieve that information and present it to the court./div>
Puritans (as Mark Noo)
One of the reasons the Puritans fled to the New World was religious freedom. Once they arrived in the New World they promptly began putting anyone who disagreed with them in the "stocks" or worse./div>
Patents cost money (as Mark1)
There are nearly endless reasons to deny a patent. So why did the USPTO grant the patent in the first place. I don't get it but I do have faith that the judge knew and did the right thing./div>
Re: invaliatin patents (as Mark1)
They would be stupid not to (as Mark1)
Stormin Norman of Iraq fame found out as much as he could about Saddam Hussein. In a TV program he said he did this. Gen. Norman read an account that Saddam would not come out of a surrounded bunker until he was down to 2 or 3 bullets. That told the General that Saddam was not likely to give up.
Any information on a persons temperment, political affiliations, resolve, level of intelligence is all useful.
Not finding out as much as you can about your enemy is dereliction of duty.
I would have asked for their social media information too./div>
(untitled comment) (as Mark1)
If anyone is going to make it possible for me to live forever they will need to create a time machine too.
I'm 45 years old, overweight, and a bunch of other stuff. Who wants to be preserved in this condition?
That was a cool post. I had no idea that kind of stuff was being done./div>
32 members of congress (as Mark1)
Nike lawyers (as Mark1)
The post you wrote sounds like a pretty open and shut case but, there is probably a lot more going on than what we know right now.
I would expect to hear a lot more about the relationship between the plaintiff and defendant./div>
SCOTUS blog (as Mark1)
I love the law. So many ways to attack the opposition.
These guys manage to talk about legal matters in a way that an intelligent layman can understand. They should be getting preferential treatment/div>
Ethical duty of candor (as Mark1)
Has anyone challenged over this point.
I also assume they are telling this to a federal judge. Fedral judges have lifetime appointments. You don't fool around with them.
Report their attorney to the state bar. I'm sure they would want to know about this.
Sometimes they won't take action without a complaint. Give them on so they can do their job.
I absolutely loathe Comcast./div>
(untitled comment) (as Schleprock)
No wonder the rest of America doesn't understand. In some instances a few addiction appear to be fabricated out of thin air.
The DSM now has a better definition but it still doesn't jibe with the ASAM (American Society of Addiction Medicine) definition./div>
(untitled comment) (as Schleprock)
Re: useful idiots (as Schleprock)
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by raging.alcoholic.
Submit a story now.
Tools & Services
TwitterFacebook
RSS
Podcast
Research & Reports
Company
About UsAdvertising Policies
Privacy
Contact
Help & FeedbackMedia Kit
Sponsor/Advertise
Submit a Story
More
Copia InstituteInsider Shop
Support Techdirt