Nike, Huge IP Proponent, Blatantly Infringes Shawne Merriman's Trademark
from the live-by-IP-law,-die-by-IP-law dept
Let's lay out a couple of things we know. First, trademark is one of the better IP laws out there, ostensibly designed to limit customer confusion between brands (though it's still open to significant abuse). We also know that Nike, maker of all things apparel, firmly believes in the strongest of protections against anyone infringing on any of their intellectual property. We also know that Nike firmly believes that limits on copying sure as hell don't apply to Nike.
But I'm not sure we knew just how brazen they could be. Such appears to be the case when Nike decides to just blatantly use someone else's trademark of which they were absolutely aware.
Former San Diego Chargers linebacker Shawne Merriman is suing athletic equipment giant Nike in San Diego federal court, alleging unfair competition and trademark infringement of his "Lights Out" brand. The suit, filed by Merriman's company, Lights Out Holdings, LLC, demands immediate injunctive relief to stop Nike's alleged actions, plus millions of dollars in damages. Merriman said he holds the federal trademark for the "Lights Out" brand on a Nike clothing line, which includes a broad range of apparel for men, women and children.We deal a lot with frivolous trademark threats and suits that never appear to amount to much of the customer confusion the law is supposed to address, but this doesn't appear to be one of those cases. We're dealing with Nike using the mark, which Merriman holds, on similar sports apparel and clothes. Merriman is a sports figure whose company produces a clothing line. What makes this most egregious is that Nike was quite aware of the mark.
In late 2006 or 2007, according to the lawsuit, Nike entered into negotiations with Merriman for a "Lights Out" line of apparel. Negotiations between Merriman and Nike were unsuccessful but "after these discussions Nike decided to use the `Lights Out' clothing brand anyway," the suit alleges.How nice of them. I'm sure they would look quite kindly on anyone who decided to just appropriate their infamous swoosh. Hypocrisy, thy name is Nike.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: hypocrisy, lights out, shawne merriman, trademark
Companies: nike
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Nike lawyers
The post you wrote sounds like a pretty open and shut case but, there is probably a lot more going on than what we know right now.
I would expect to hear a lot more about the relationship between the plaintiff and defendant.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Nike lawyers
Nike is the Defendant. Nike isn't the one suing, they're the one being sued for using someone else's Trademark, knowingly, w/o permission.
This is an open & shut case, the question is how much will Nike be paying.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Nike lawyers
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Nike lawyers
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Nike lawyers
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Nike lawyers
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Just
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Let's hope the coda isn't:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Let's hope the coda isn't:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Blatant trademark ripping is their heritage.
Even the swoosh is not original anyway.
Were the first NIKE's not just onitsuka tiger's imported from Japan with parts of the labels peeled off to make the swoosh anyway?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]