I wanted to make a correction to your article: The Wall Street Journal author (Dionne Searcey) did in fact list the four patents in question in the article dated August 28th, on page A4./div>
I have 10 years of experience communicating with the USPTO, and thought I've heard and read it all by now. But apparently not. This was quite funny!/div>
Very distasteful and bizarre action by USOC. Considering the non-profit's financial status - and I'm assuming USOC's legal team did their due diligence before suing the company - this lawsuit couldn't have possibly ever been for any financial gain. I therefore interpret it as a pre-emptive strike and a warning against any and all companies out there entertaining any thoughts of using the word "olympic" as part of their business./div>
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by Sirpa Aggarwal.
The WSJ article re. the patents
(untitled comment)
(untitled comment)
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by Sirpa Aggarwal.
Submit a story now.
Tools & Services
TwitterFacebook
RSS
Podcast
Research & Reports
Company
About UsAdvertising Policies
Privacy
Contact
Help & FeedbackMedia Kit
Sponsor/Advertise
Submit a Story
More
Copia InstituteInsider Shop
Support Techdirt