Paul Allen Becomes A Patent Troll, Sues Google, Apple, Facebook, eBay And Others...
from the those-who-can't-innovate,-litigate dept
Microsoft's "other" co-founder, Paul Allen, has had a long string of business failures since leaving Microsoft. It's actually quite impressive. One of his most high profile ventures, back in the 90's, was Interval Research, which was designed to be a pure research institute "done right." It was described as trying to replicate Xerox PARC, but that it would actually commercialize the amazing ideas. Of course, as we've pointed out for ages, ideas are only a small part of innovation. Actual execution is the really difficult part, and one thing Interval was never able to do was execute. After eight years and over $100 million of Allen's money, the operation was shut down back in 2000. That was about the last we'd heard of Interval... until now.Because, while Interval was unable to actually execute, thanks to the wonders of the US Patent system, it was able to secure lots of patents, and now it looks like Paul Allen has gone full on patent troll. He's using those patents to sue Google (and, separately, YouTube), Apple, AOL, eBay, Facebook, Netflix, Yahoo, Office Depot, OfficeMax and Staples -- you know, the companies that actually did innovate and did execute -- for being successful where he failed. Of course, Paul Allen has been tangentially related to patent trolling operations in the past, so perhaps it was just a matter of time. Still, this is a pretty disgusting situation all around.
The WSJ article about the lawsuits doesn't mention the actual patents (why do so few reporters actually point you to the useful info?), but they're the following:
- 6,263,507: "Browser for use in navigating a body of information, with particular application to browsing information represented by audio data."
- 6,034,652 & 6,788,314 (really the same patent, involving continuations): "Attention manager for occupying the peripheral attention of a person in the vicinity of a display device"
- 6,757,682: "Alerting users to items of current interest"
![Hide This Hide this](https://ii.techdirt.com/s/t/i/topclose.png)
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: patents, paul allen
Companies: aol, apple, ebay, facebook, google, interval licensing, interval research, netflix, office depot, office max, staples, yahoo, youtube
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Google and its YouTube subsidiary among the 11 companies sued
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Seriously?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Seriously?
•6,757,682: "Alerting users to items of current interest"
This has to be one of the most broad patents ever. Hell based on this the people that sumbit stories to blogs are violating this patent aren't they? That might mean that all you folks that submit stories for Mike to talk about here are violating Allen's patent.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Grammar Nazi Alert
90s and not 90's
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Billionaire Innovation Terrorist
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bad times at Microsoft? Who knows, but check out the price on these buses.
The auction:
http://bit.ly/bJZhuY
If these buses were actually used by MSFT, they would probably have been used to pick up and transport employees to and from work; kind of like elementary school, but actually is a fringe benefit for employees.
So, I've been thinking about getting one of these buses, growing a beard like Paul Allen's, and traveling the country like a hippie. After all, the auction is starting at $500, and I would love to put "Party Van" on the sides. Who knows, maybe I will find a fresh, unopened copy of Microsoft Vista sandwiched in one of the seat cushions.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Bad times at Microsoft? Who knows, but check out the price on these buses.
Not any indication MS is falling on hard times, unlike Mr Allen from the looks of it needing to become a patent troll.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
prior art "me anytime in the last 40 years shouting LOOK at anything, of interest" (i'm sure i've done this alot i have a habit of shouting when i see something of interest and a shout is more or less an alert)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This is one case I'm going to let play out before I jump on the screw Paul Allen bandwagon because I've been a fan of his past work... but I am majorly sad to see this popping up today.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Every MS competitor
Does anyone know how much Microsoft stock Allen still owns.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Every MS competitor
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Just Wondering
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Just Wondering
Pretty sure JK Rowling registered that one for her dementors....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Just Wondering
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Just Wondering
Yes, Halliburton:
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20081107/0118162765.shtml
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Obligation to defend patents
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Obligation to defend patents
No, you're confusing it with trademarks.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Legacy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Damn that's covered everything!
Jackpot!!
Paul better hurry up and add Microsoft to the list of defendants, along with blogs. He'd crack another 13 billion in no time flat!
How to ruin your reputation and legacy all at the same time.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Remember Lotus. They sued themselves out of existence. Maybe IBM will rescue Paul Allen too.
We want to follow this case closely because it looks like the days of garage innovation are over! It looks like we cannot write any software anymore without violating someones patent. Goodbye innovation and welcome to the great depression. Without freedom to innovate in this country we run the risk of making no products.
Manufacturing of our products is all done offshore and without our garage guys we are losers. Every major tech company in this country started in someones garage, bedroom or workshop, not a corporate office or lab with the correct clearances and fees paid.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The WSJ article re. the patents
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Paul Allen, patent troll
Especially with "continuation" patents, which are now always misused to allow the effect of a "lemellson" patent, we have a perfect storm of legislators desperate for campaign funds (and a cushy retirement), a patent system forced to be (in effect) for-profit but "for-the-country", and vicious people that are all too willing to game the system.
My clients and I use the system for the common good; but more and more, there are scammers misusing it to our detriment.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Paul Allen, patent troll
[ link to this | view in chronology ]