Reminds me of when the highest forms of encryption in Netscape couldn't be exported, as if terrorists,criminals and nefarious enemy countries would have paid attention to the geographical download restrictions./div>
They think terrorists are too stupid to scout out the subways to see if the cops have put up a checkpoint before taking in anything sensitive. Of COURSE they think they're too stupid to use encryption./div>
They have to assume that terrorists are stupid and it would never occur to them to protect their communications if Snowden leaked the fact that the government was listening on the line.../div>
Ah, good. It "doesn't affect you". A perfectly good reason to ban something. Why should you care that not everyone has access to a computer with fast internet at home? You have one, so anyone who doesn't is just out of luck. As long as the law has fixed a non-existent problem with dangerously vague language, all's good in the world./div>
Re: Re: 'Sacrifices must be made. Your rights for instance, those have got to go'
Re:
(untitled comment)
Re: Maybe the financial institutions will put a stop to this
(untitled comment)
(untitled comment)
Re:
(untitled comment)
(untitled comment)
Extending copyright on existing works is one thing, restoring copyright to works whose copyright has expired is quite a bigger beast./div>
Re:
Of COURSE they think they're too stupid to use encryption./div>
Once again start with the assumption that terrorists are stupid
Re: Re: Billy's right.
Re:
Re: Re: Re:
Re: Re:
And buying airline tickets to escape their bookies./div>
Re: WRONG. Has not "effectively banned all computers, tablets and smartphones".
(untitled comment)
If it was illegal before, why the need for this law?/div>
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by uberfrood.
Submit a story now.
Tools & Services
TwitterFacebook
RSS
Podcast
Research & Reports
Company
About UsAdvertising Policies
Privacy
Contact
Help & FeedbackMedia Kit
Sponsor/Advertise
Submit a Story
More
Copia InstituteInsider Shop
Support Techdirt