Lessons Learned From The Dot Com Shakeout

from the build-a-real-business dept

This theme seems to be popping up a lot lately. Companies might have been better prepared for the dot com shakeout if they'd built a real business rather than just spent all sorts of money on hype.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    ssoni, 11 Dec 2000 @ 4:50pm

    x

    You still don't get it, do you? It was NEVER about making a "real" company. It was about getting any EXCUSE for a company out the door before the flood, in order to cash out via the IPO equity markets feeding frenzy. It was NEVER about building a company. The underwriters and insiders who dumped are laughing all the way to the bank, as the suckers who bought the hype (and the stock) are now complaining about shaky business models... This just gets better and better..

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Mike (profile), 11 Dec 2000 @ 5:05pm

      Re: x

      Nope. Obviously I don't get it at all.

      Did the world lose the ability to understand sarcasm when the Nasdaq died?

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        ssoni, 11 Dec 2000 @ 9:17pm

        x

        Well, now that we're all clear on that we can move on.

        To recap, these firms were never supposed to have a business model. They were simply "fronts" to make stocks. VC and insiders sold their shares and retired, and as a nice side effect, the country could have something fun to do with their new internet connections and profits from the mid 90's tech bull market....daytrade!

        I've never met a person who thought these were supposed to be real companies that would make money, lol!

        link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Ryan, 12 Dec 2000 @ 8:26am

          Re: x

          I actually believe there are one or two real business (although the majority are just store fronts filled with walking dead dot commers). One company with potential to be a real business is Amazon (no, I'm not nuts) if they lower their burn rate they'll may be able to actually get some very impressive profits margins.

          link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.