Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

• 

  Anonymous Coward, 6 Mar 2001 @ 12:04pm

  
  

  Go for the kill

  Various posters on message boards are already talking about ways of getting around the filters, such as mispelling names or using Pig Latin. All this effort shows that people don't want to get music, they want free music. Napster should be shutdown and the music companies come out with a reasonable priced pay alternative as soon as possible.

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Ed, 6 Mar 2001 @ 12:39pm

  
  

  Future of Napster

  Aside from the technical differences of P2P vs. typical client-server communication, Napster was essentially just a bunch of warez sites with the important difference that there was nobody the copyright holder could go to get anything shut down: find your companies' software at a warez site and you can get their ISP to shut it down very quickly and possibly go after the individual trading the warez too. Napster shielded the individual behind essentially anonymous ids, and claimed they couldn't and didn't need to shut anybody down.

  Now the court has ruled that they do need to behave like an ISP at least in the sense that they must shut down any obvious copyright infringement. What that means is that it's no longer a place to avoid the scrutiny of copyright holders. In the long run I'd expect it to be as hard to find a copyrighted song on Napster as it is to find it on a warez ftp site. (That's not to say the files won't be there; the swapping will just have to go underground behind obfuscated names, secret passwords, etc. All the RIAA has to do is just to push the swapping scene far enough into a niche that mainstream users can't figure it out any more.)

  Whether Napster survives depends on whether there's any legitimate traffic left, and whether the advantages of their P2P model, if any, are enough to justify its continued use for legal reasons.

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]