Another Study Shows Digital Music Drives Sales

from the how-about-that? dept

How long will the music industry ignore all the evidence that suggests their continued insistence on trying to legislate new technologies out of existence hurts them more than helps them? A new study shows that people who download music and have CD burners tend to buy more music. Of course, the music industry will continue to ignore that this is even a possibility, and focus on having CD burners and file sharing systems banned. This really does sound like the VCR all over again.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Albert, 14 Jun 2002 @ 10:05am

    Wired.com

    Is this site owned by wired.com? I'm just wondering, because it seems like almost all of the links are from there. thanks

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Ed, 14 Jun 2002 @ 10:20am

      Re: Wired.com

      Troll. There's only two from wired on the whole front page.

      What's going on with all the anonymous and semi-anonymous idiots with nothing to say other than 'boring!' or 'too many stories from the same site'?

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 14 Jun 2002 @ 10:23am

        Re: Wired.com

        just offering some (hopefully) helpful and constructive criticisms. Sorry if you're offended. If this site just consists of links to well-known news sites, where's the value? I can just go directly to these sites and read the articles myself.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Mike, 14 Jun 2002 @ 10:25am

          Re: Wired.com

          Look, jerky, your constant sniping is starting to piss me off. If you have valid criticisms, Id be happy hear them. Otherwise just shut your face - or I'll shut it for you.

          link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          Mike (profile), 14 Jun 2002 @ 10:31am

          Re: Wired.com

          Please define how doing what you do is in any way "constructive"? I have tried explaining to you multiple times the choice of sites we pick. I've also pointed out that we have a very legitimate feedback mechanism.

          So... for the FINAL time: Techdirt posts articles we find interesting from whereever they come from. If you want to post articles from "obscure" places, go ahead and create your own site.

          Techdirt was never intended to post articles from obscure sites. Plenty of people find value in the articles we post and the summaries and commentary. Just because you don't, doesn't mean you have to be annoying to everyone else.

          I've also pointed out that we read hundreds of sites each day. We pick the best, most interesting stories that we find and which we want to see on the site.

          What I really don't understand is why if you find so little value in the site you feel the ridiculous need to come back each day and point it out. Go off to those news sites and read the articles yourself.

          Oh, I KNOW why. Because you're not here offering "constructive" criticism. You're not here to be helpful. You're just being a troll. One of these days, maybe, you'll grow up.

          link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      2Lazy2Register, 14 Jun 2002 @ 10:40am

      Re: Wired.com

      What's the matter? Get tired of having all of your useless posts modded (appropriately) to Troll on Slashdot? Last month there was an almost identical pinhead bitching because all of the stories were from news.com. I don't see a) how both could be possible, b) how it's any of your business anyway, or c) why you even bother to come here since you've decided there is nothing of value for you here. It's useless sniping like this that turned a lot of us off of slashdot in the first place.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Chris, 14 Jun 2002 @ 11:26am

    Trolls

    I hate to be the one to point out the obvious, but everytime we reply to one of these idiots, we virtually guarentee that they will post again. Ignore them, they'll soon get bored and go away. But you guys already knew that ;)

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Chris, 14 Jun 2002 @ 11:26am

    Trolls

    I hate to be the one to point out the obvious, but everytime we reply to one of these idiots, we virtually guarentee that they will post again. Ignore them, they'll soon get bored and go away. But you guys already knew that ;)

    By the way - I like Mike's selection of articles...

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Duffman, 14 Jun 2002 @ 12:28pm

      Re: Trolls

      I come here so I don't have to go to all those other sites - it's a convenience thing. Plus I like Mike's commentary on the stories (whether I agree with it or not), something not provided on those sites.

      Oh, and gotta love those trolls....

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Florian M Unterkircher, 14 Jun 2002 @ 4:42pm

    No Subject Given

    It's rather obvious that cd-writer ownership and an interest in consuming music is positively correlated. However, the statement that people owming a cd-writer tend to buy more music does not really support the argument that the music industry does not lose sales because of that.

    I assume that, generally, how much music you buy and whether you own electronic devices such as a cd writer depends on your income level (therefore, both are really dependent variables of a third one).

    For a statement like "cd-writer ownership encourages people to buy more music" to be verified, one would have to check which variables have a significant influence on the purchase level (factor analysis) and then see how those relate with each other (covariance).

    ...or something like this, but I think you get the idea.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 14 Jun 2002 @ 6:39pm

    Re: Re:

    Re: No Subject Given
    You also are ignoring that most if not all of the file trading represents only "potential" lost sales. You cannot assume that because someone downloaded a song, that he/she would have ever actually bought it if the download did not exist.

    Re: Trolls
    This is Mike's site.
    It is Mike's choice to post what Mike likes.

    Go to http://www.register.com/ and you will find that www.TrollDirt.com is available, hint, hint.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.