If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Josh Hawley Thinks We Should Break Up Twitter Because He Doesn't Like The Company's Editorial Choices
- Techdirt Podcast Episode 305: Missouri Hasn't Really Learned Its Lesson
- Missouri Governor Doubles Down On 'View Source' Hacking Claim; PAC Now Fundraising Over This Bizarrely Stupid Claim
- Snowflake Josh Hawley Seems To Think The 1st Amendment Means Simon & Schuster Has To Give Him A Book Contract
- Parler, Desperate For Attention, Pretends It Doesn't Need Section 230
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
a reader's reply...
"Since Dr. Welles's arrest has for some reason become a topic of consideration in this format, let us set the record straight. He is not a villain but a victim whose arrest was due to neither stupdity [sic] nor criminal conduct on his part but MALfeasence [sic] on the part of the police. The state's case is based entirely on unsubstantiated hearsy [sic], characterized by obstuction [sic] of justice and features withholding evidence, tampering with evidence, falsifying evidence, fabricating evidence and multiple counts of perjury. The charge against Dr. Welles is to be dropped."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]