Trojan Defense Works Again

from the it's-happening-every-where dept

That's it. If you ever get arrested for any type of crime that involves a computer, your defense is clear: "it wasn't me, it was a secret trojan horse that got installed on my computer." It's worked for someone accused of child porn and for someone accused of tax fraud. And, now, it's worked for the kid accused of the kid accused of doing a denial of service attack on the Port of Houston. The defense worked, despite the prosecution bringing up an expert who claimed there was no evidence anyone had hacked into the guy's computer. In all of these cases, who knows who's right. The law clearly says they're innocent, and perhaps they really are innocent (the tax one is particularly questionable - since the guy was a tax preparer, and the supposed trojan only messed around with his own taxes). However, you know that from now on, this is the standard defense anyone charged with a computer crime will use - guilty or innocent. Update: Interesting opinion piece on the verdict asking if a typical jury trial still makes sense for technology related cases, as the jury is unlikely to understand the finer points of the technology in question.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Alex, 17 Oct 2003 @ 9:57am

    No Subject Given

    People will abuse the system, apparently, but I'd rather see some guilty person go unpunished than an innocent guy being jailed for something he didn't do.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 17 Oct 2003 @ 11:02am

    No jury trials for hard to understand crimes?

    I think the opinion piece on whether or not jury trials should be used for alleged crimes involving complicated technological issues is completely reactionary as this same basic principal (people are to uninformed/uneducated etc.) can be applied to many many other crimes. I still remember after the OJ trial watching an interview with one of the jurors and the interviewer asked the juror... 'what about all that blood evidence... 6 months of blood testimony, how do you rationalize that??' The juror straight faced responds to the interviewer... 'well you know... a lot of people can have the same blood type'. I think that pretty much sums it up.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    bbay, 17 Oct 2003 @ 2:26pm

    Technical Juries

    If I were accused of a tech related crime that I didn't commit I would be very nervous about a jury selected from the general public. I might prefer a jury of technically adept people. A jury of my 'peers' as it were.

    On the other hand, if I HAD commited some crime, I would want a jury of people ignorant of the technical details involved. A jury that could be easily confused or deceived.

    Both scenarios are really arguments in favor of 'expert juries', from a standpoint of getting justice done.

    If the current trend of professional specialization continues, our society may begin to segment into seperate cultures formed around large isolated bodies of knowledge with less and less in common with each other and with the general population. In this scenario it might become necessary to convene juries from the knowledge domain in which the crime was committed.

    I'm unsure if I find this a plausible future or not.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    Anonymous, 18 Oct 2003 @ 6:57am

    No Subject Given

    The people being sued by the RIAA should start using the defense of "a hacker must have placed those copyrighted songs in my kazza shared directory without my knowledge!"

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    Adam Rice, 18 Oct 2003 @ 12:36pm

    No Subject Given

    This reminds me of a related idea I've had:

    If the RIAA were to bust me for file-sharing (which, of course, I would never do), I'd simply point out "Hey, I have an open WiFi node. Sure, it was on my IP address, but it wasn't me, it was a neighbor. Or some guy with a laptop in his car."

    And then I'd run over to Fry's and get a WiFi node, pronto.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. identicon
    sMoses, 18 Oct 2003 @ 3:08pm

    Re: No Subject Given

    Yeah, but wouldn't you still be responsible for someone else's actions if you owned the wifi node? Maybe if you had an open node that you claimed you didn't know was open that you claim somone else used. Then they couldn't get you for knowingly violating their hallowed copyrights. But you would still be responsible for damages. Which is an interesting question. If the RIAA can go after anyone they want to on kazaa and gnutella, can they just randomly pick out people with open wifi nodes and sue them for facilitating illegal file sharing?

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.