Trojan Defense Works Again
from the it's-happening-every-where dept
That's it. If you ever get arrested for any type of crime that involves a computer, your defense is clear: "it wasn't me, it was a secret trojan horse that got installed on my computer." It's worked for someone accused of child porn and for someone accused of tax fraud. And, now, it's worked for the kid accused of the kid accused of doing a denial of service attack on the Port of Houston. The defense worked, despite the prosecution bringing up an expert who claimed there was no evidence anyone had hacked into the guy's computer. In all of these cases, who knows who's right. The law clearly says they're innocent, and perhaps they really are innocent (the tax one is particularly questionable - since the guy was a tax preparer, and the supposed trojan only messed around with his own taxes). However, you know that from now on, this is the standard defense anyone charged with a computer crime will use - guilty or innocent. Update: Interesting opinion piece on the verdict asking if a typical jury trial still makes sense for technology related cases, as the jury is unlikely to understand the finer points of the technology in question.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No jury trials for hard to understand crimes?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Technical Juries
On the other hand, if I HAD commited some crime, I would want a jury of people ignorant of the technical details involved. A jury that could be easily confused or deceived.
Both scenarios are really arguments in favor of 'expert juries', from a standpoint of getting justice done.
If the current trend of professional specialization continues, our society may begin to segment into seperate cultures formed around large isolated bodies of knowledge with less and less in common with each other and with the general population. In this scenario it might become necessary to convene juries from the knowledge domain in which the crime was committed.
I'm unsure if I find this a plausible future or not.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
If the RIAA were to bust me for file-sharing (which, of course, I would never do), I'd simply point out "Hey, I have an open WiFi node. Sure, it was on my IP address, but it wasn't me, it was a neighbor. Or some guy with a laptop in his car."
And then I'd run over to Fry's and get a WiFi node, pronto.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]