First Thing, We Kill All The Virus Writers...
from the who-else-can-we-kill? dept
Over at Slate, Steven Landsburg has come up with something of a "modest proposal" that doesn't actually seem all that tongue in cheek where he tries to make an economic argument that we should just kill all virus writers - arguing that this makes more economic sense than killing murderers. He even admits that his numbers are rough estimates, and unfortunately, it looks like he's using some of the hyped up virus damage estimates that have no basis in reality. There are ton of other incorrect assumptions in the piece (including how evenly distributed both the costs and the benefits of getting rid of viruses would be) that make it kind of silly all around. However, Ernest Miller makes the best point when he wonders why Landsburg doesn't advocate killing some of those scamming company executives that have become so popular these days, who, you could argue did a lot more damage. And, that, in general is the problem with this argument. You could find plenty of actions that appear to have "cost" the industry billions of dollars and then suggest we execute those responsible - but it's a narrow view of what factors are actually impacting the "economy" involved. For example, Landsburg leaves out the fact that if we got rid of all the virus writers, it would kill the anti-virus/security industry, which seems to contribute plenty of money to the economy as well. Where Landsburg is right is the importance of trying to quantify the costs and benefits to various actions. However, where he sets a dreadful example is in focusing so narrowly that he doesn't admit that there are other consequences to his proposal that play into those costs and benefits.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Capital crimes
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
appropriate punishment
on a related issue:
SF writer Larry Niven pointed out many years ago that the value of human body organs far transcends the monetary value of most criminals' nefarious enterprises. Thus: most crimes become punishable by organ removal. This would be particularly appropriate with virus writers, thought to be mostly 16 to 26 and with still-healthy organs ripe for transplantation. Most of the business scammers (Enron, Worldcom, etc.) are too old to have organs worth transplanting.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
KILL THEM ALL
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Kill Virus Writers
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Virus writers need to suffer
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I would castrate the male virus writers, and insert knives into the female virus writers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]