Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

• 

  dorpus, 10 Aug 2004 @ 11:18am

  
  

  Double Standard

  Software on discs come with plenty of copy protection features, and there is a lot of software piracy that goes on, but how come Mike never complains about that?
  

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • 

    John, 10 Aug 2004 @ 11:35am

    
    

    Re: Double Stupidity

    Doesn't mike complain about misleading BSA stats and such? Where's the double standard?

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • 

    Anonymous Coward, 10 Aug 2004 @ 4:11pm

    
    

    Re: Double Standard

    "Software on discs come with plenty of copy protection features"
    -- such as the one the 16 year old norwegian kid cracked?
    
    "and there is a lot of software piracy that goes on"
    -- seen it firsthand, have you? Offer proof, much?
    
    Dorpus, your country is showing, and it's obvious you've been watching too many "piracy takes money from my kids" ads at the beginning of "I, robot" that you're believing a dollar not taken is a dollar lost.
    
    I assert that the vast, vast majority of vob copying apps are used to *legally* duplicate DVD media, and that by far most blank media is for similarly legitimate uses. I'll back up my facts like you did. Read it a few times and you'll believe them too - it's apparent you'll believe anything you're told enough times.
    
    I used to respect your posts, Dorpus. Get off the drugs.
    

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Loraan, 10 Aug 2004 @ 11:34am

  
  

  No Subject Given

  It amazes me that some people refuse to even acknowledge that DVD copying software IS used to pirate discs by lots of folks. Granted, the people who make the software can't acknowledge it, or they might lose their "significant noninfringing use" exemption, but what about the rest of us? Some people used DVDxCopy to back up their legally owned discs. Lots of people also used it to copy rented discs or copy discs from friends. It's absurd to suggest otherwise.

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • 

    SpikedSynapse, 10 Aug 2004 @ 11:51am

    
    

    Re: No Subject Given

    I use Free ware to copy dvd... why bother with dvd x-copy

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

    • 

      Jon, 10 Aug 2004 @ 6:25pm

      
      

      Re: No Subject Given

      Free Ware? You mean like dd?
      
      Hey MPAA, all UNIX systems are required by the POSIX standard to have a dangerous disc copying utility known only by the mysterious acronym, dd.

      [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Brad Hill, 11 Aug 2004 @ 5:45am

  
  

  321 & copyright law

  I mourn the passing of 321 as much as anybody, but you're wrong about needing proof that its users broke copyright law. I'm not a lawyer, but it seems clear that the company is in violation of section 1201 of the DMCA, by offering code that breaks copy-protection. That's all the MPAA needs, and that's one reason why the DMCA needs to be repealed.

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Anonymous Coward, 11 Aug 2004 @ 7:12am

  
  

  No Subject Given

  yup they settled the arguement alright
  hi! meet my group of bloodthirsty lawyers
  boom you are out of business
  arguement settled

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]