Wireless Data Currently About Ubiquity, Not Speed

from the nice-one dept

Wed, Sep 22nd 2004 10:33am — Mike Masnick

We've already joked about how all wireless data services, no matter how fast, start their pricing at $80/month, in the hopes that business users with expense accounts will sign up while the network provider works out all their network and capacity problems. The prices eventually drop as the provider feels better about the network and (much more importantly) competitors have launched their own, faster, networks also at the $80 price point. Still, in an interview about wireless data offerings, the co-CEO of wireless data company Seven, provides an interesting rationale for the $80 pricing. He basically admits that it's too expensive for the power user, but just fine for the casual user. Seems a bit counter-intuitive, doesn't it? The power user, of course, is also a bandwidth hog -- and the carriers don't want bandwidth hogs clogging up these networks, so no matter what the price, the speeds of most wireless data service offerings aren't enough. However, for the more casual user, bandwidth isn't nearly as big an issue. For the casual user signing up for wireless data plans, the issue is ubiquitous connectivity -- and that's the target audience for these users. So, the question being asked is the wrong one. The interviewer is basically asking how they can justify charging $80/month for "what amounts to a very slow DSL connection." The answer (though, not this directly) is basically that users are buying the ubiquity and the mobility -- not the speed.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

1 Comment

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Derek Kerton (profile), 22 Sep 2004 @ 10:33am

Not Clear
Nice idea. There certainly should be a premium for ubiquity and/or mobility. However, that hardly explains the ridiculous propensity of mobile data carriers ALWAYS offering their unlimited plans at $80 - seemingly regardless of speed or ubiquity. Consider Ricochet, which only worked in certain regions: $80. Consider Sprint PCS 1xRTT which offers nationwide coverage almost as good as their voice network: $80. Consider Verizon Wireless with EV-DO service in just two cities: $80. Consider AT&T with EDGE nationwide or UMTS in six cities: all $80. Cingular nationwide GPRS? $80. The real reason the $80 price point is so often used is because it is the market-clearing price where supply (of network bandwidth) meets demand. Price it at $50, and hordes of customers will drop their DSL plans for the mobile broadband deal, and overload the network. Price it at $100, and practically no one will sign on. When Wireless WAN technologies that actually were designed from the ground up are launched, such as Woosh (UMTS TDD) in New Zealand, then the prices can be competitive with DSL, because the network can handle the increased demand that will cause.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]