Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

• 

  MissinLnk, 20 Oct 2004 @ 5:18pm

  
  

  what are we doing in that time?

  Sitting there trying to get our brains working. I work in an ice box, and I swear it's nearly impossible to get anything done. Unless I'm completely in a zone, I'm lucky to keep my concentraction for more than 20 minutes at a time.

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  TJ, 20 Oct 2004 @ 6:11pm

  
  

  A happy medium?

  The human body senses temperature quite well, and everyone's ideal comfort zone is a bit different. Before every meeting at work it seems some people always comment the room is too cold and others that the same room is too warm. With moderate humidity, 68 F seems chilly to many people, and 77 is warm to many people in common office attire. I wonder what the study would have shown with temperatures between 72 and 75 degrees, which is the range offices I've worked in have tended to use.
  

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Mike, 20 Oct 2004 @ 8:10pm

  
  

  No Subject Given

  I remember a study in college where someone made the lights brighter in a plant and found that productivity increased. Funny though, productivity slowly declined over time. So he decided to dim the lights - and lwo and behold, productvity increased again. the moral of the story is that it was the change in the environment that increased productivity, not the event itself.

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • 

    xman, 21 Oct 2004 @ 4:32am

    
    

    Re: No Subject Given

    That's called the Hawthorn effect and has been known about since the 1920s.

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

    • 

      bc, 21 Oct 2004 @ 10:46am

      
      

      Re: No Subject Given

      The Hawthorne studies were conducted in the 1920's, but the study wasn't released until the 50's. Many believe that performance improved not because conditions were changing but because the employees were being monitored. The study was extremely flawed it it's design, but still useful because future studies that were conducted in a more rigorous fashion also indicate that performance tends to improve when when perceives that their work is being observed.

      [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  dorpus, 20 Oct 2004 @ 9:47pm

  
  

  Funny thing about Northern California

  People in the Silicon Valley/SF bay area have this strange superstition against air conditioning. Buildings, schools, stores are sweltering hot, and people will insist the temperature is "fine", that air conditioning is evil, that only sissies need it. It's the same kind of attitudes one encounters in countries like Iraq or Vietnam. Silicon Valley claims to be all about high-tech, but in some aspects they are quite anti-technology. Cell phone reception there was very poor, and I tried more than one carrier. Despite the extreme cost of living, Valley residents are dead-set against building high-rises -- these are the sorts of anti-development attitudes we encounter in places like the deep South or Vermont.
  
  If someone builds a place that is pro-development, pro-air conditioning, great cell phone receptions, will that turn silicon valley back into the dust bowl it was?
  
  
  

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  thecaptain, 21 Oct 2004 @ 5:00am

  
  

  No Subject Given

  All I know is that we have a few old women in my office who are constantly cold unless the heat is wayyyy up. (I've measured their comfort zone in the 28-30C range if left unopposed...they do this all year around and fight tooth and nail against any attempt to USE the climate control A/C in the summer).
  
  It doesn't make me more productive. It makes me sweaty, nauseous and sleepy.

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]