Verizon Wireless Spreads EV-DO, Bets On Video
from the sounds-familiar... dept
Well, it leaked out earlier this week, but now the announcements are official. Verizon Wireless has expanded their EV-DO network (no surprise there, as they had earlier promised this expansion before the end of the year, but held off a few days to push it into CES) to a bunch more cities. However, the thing that's going to get them much more attention is the plan to offer TV on those phones. Well, not TV exactly, but the ability to stream some TV shows to phones. Of course, don't get too excited about this. Sprint has been offering something similar for a while, and AT&T Wireless started streaming video just as they were getting swallowed up by Cingular. So, it's not really that new. Of course, on the fast EV-DO network, you can bet that it's likely to work much better. Still, as has been discussed many times before, there still isn't much evidence that people really want to watch TV on their mobile phones. Unlike some other services and applications, this really doesn't let people do all that much new. It's a nice-to-have, but certainly not a need-to-have -- especially in an age of time shifting TiVo-like devices. There are fewer reasons why someone needs to watch a TV show now (with some exceptions for sports and news). While it may be useful in some niches, it's yet another example of the industry betting that the killer app for high speed networks is about broadcast rather than communication. The mobile phone is a communications device. That's why people buy it, and that's what they look to do with it. Broadcast video is unlikely to be more than a novelty.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
need to have/nice to have
Well, another thing people don't need in their cellphones is a camera, but cameraphones have been doing pretty well nonetheless. The truth is, mobile television won't succeed or fail based on how much people need it. It will succeed or not succeed based on how much people like having it, once it becomes an option. That's something the market will decide, and all we can do is sit back and see how it goes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: need to have/nice to have
TV, however, is a one-way medium, just designed to keep you staring at your screen.
So, I think there's a big difference in the two.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: need to have/nice to have
What would really be useful is if you could send tv programming to other people via your phone. Like a link to a web page, only it's a link to a stored tv broadcast or snippet.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
TV On Cellphones
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: TV On Cellphones
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: TV On Cellphones
[ link to this | view in chronology ]