Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

• 

  Beck, 2 Feb 2005 @ 1:33pm

  
  

  Wal-Mart

  
  One good thing about Wal-Mart - they don't screw around with rebates on hardware and software. When everyone else sells McAfee AntiVirus for $50 less a $20 rebate, Wal-Mart sells it for $30 out the door.
  
  It's the same for computers. The price on the shelf is the price you pay, period. It's a shame they have such an awful selection of computers. I think they would make a killing if they seriously went into that segment. If you could buy a system at Best Buy for $1,000 less $300 in rebates from four different vendors, or buy it at Wal-Mart for $700 up front, where would you go? You would also save on sales tax, since tax is charged before rebates.
  
  

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • 

    Alex, 2 Feb 2005 @ 2:46pm

    
    

    Re: Wal-Mart

    Yes. As much as I don't like Wal-Mart, hats off for being upfront honest about the prices, unlike Best Buy or Circuit City advertising that INCREDIBLE PRICE OF $599* for a new laptop
    
    (* after $400 mail-in rebates to 3 different locations)

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

    • 

      Jelly Roll, 2 Feb 2005 @ 3:13pm

      
      

      Re: Wal-Mart

      I suppose we owe a debt of gratitude to the people who don't send in their rebates. They are the reason I haven't paid a cent for cd-r's for years. But, man-oh-man, do I hate filling those f'ing forms out. Just venting.

      [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Beck, 2 Feb 2005 @ 1:37pm

  
  

  Dell

  
  I have always hated the idea that Dell offers rebates when you buy a computer.
  
  If I buy directly from Dell online, and give my money directly to Dell, why don't they just discount their price? Why do I have to pay them and then go through the rebate process to get my money back from them?
  
  This article explains why. It's because they want to take advantage of their customers.
  
  

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • 

    nonuser, 2 Feb 2005 @ 5:50pm

    
    

    Re: Dell

    Funny you should mention Dell. After I bought one of their PCs I followed all the rebate instructions to a 'T', even made a backup copy of the packing slip when they (falsely) claimed I hadn't sent it in... and they stiffed me anyway. Changed their story and said I ordered from a web page (since long gone, of course) to which the rebate didn't apply.
    So you can guess what I do with Dell's catalogs when they come in the mail.

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Itch, 2 Feb 2005 @ 1:49pm

  
  

  Rebate Bounties

  I recently went round and round tring to get a 100 dollar rebate from a Tivo purchase. The bloody company made life a living hell getting it, though I made sure I got the check in the end.
  It made me wonder though. With all the hassle and time involved, maybe that will allow for a new business to be formed. I was willing to give up to 10% of the rebate just for someone to harrass the people everyday, and to stay on top of it. I know there are companies that exists specifically to take over notes and loans. Maybe the same could be done with rebates.

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • 

    Director Mitch, 2 Feb 2005 @ 6:56pm

    
    

    Not Surprising

    A few years ago I was working with one of the top inkjet printer companies. At Christmas, they had a mail-in discount on one of their printers that was so large, that it was cheaper to buy the printer (with discount) than it was to buy a stand-alone refill ink cartridge.
    
    Their response - only 20% of the people sent in the rebates.
    
    This number is a lot lower that what is quoted here, so my guess this number changes based on segment, time of the year, where the purchase happens, and other items (for example, I would bet that low-end rebates for day-to-day items are redeemed more than high-end items).

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

    • 

      Bill Eccles, 2 Feb 2005 @ 7:44pm

      
      

      Re: Not Surprising

      Remember the iMac's introduction? Apparently, Apple had a MAP policy in place and the net result was that the difference in prices between the major catalog companies (MacMall and ClubMac spring to mind) was $0. So they differentiated their product by offering free stuff by rebate, mostly scanners.
      
      Remember what that did to UMAX and others?
      
      All of a sudden, people started returning those rebates to the tune of >90% return rate. And you can't build a zillion scanners for $10 each and stay afloat.< br>
      I guess it's back down to the usual, huh?

      [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Dan Rocha, 3 Feb 2005 @ 10:25am

  
  

  Not actually 41%

  It's confusing in the writeup, but the Newsday article says that half of the survey respondents did not attempt to get the rebate. OF THOSE, 41% said it was because they forgot. So the headline is a bit misleading (it's really 20.5%) who forgot.

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  Manuel de Santiago Hernandez, 5 Oct 2007 @ 10:47am

  
  

  I need an explanation -in spanish- of Amazon

  I found in my credit card a charge of $79. I was never advised of this $79.00 charged. I need an explanation -in spanish- of Amazon, because I have sold books in that lenguage.
  
  Manuel de Santiago

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

• 

  james naas, 28 Aug 2017 @ 2:10pm

  
  

  ethics of mail-in rebates

  If a company wants to give you a lower or sale price then it is simple to markdown the price at the front end. Given the fact that many people do not, for various reasons, fuss with the rebate process, how ethical is this practice? Just because it's legal does not mean it is ethical. But I know all those companies really care about their customers.
  All hail the God of Greed and Money.

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]