Forget The Last Mile, It's Inside The Home That Will Cause IPTV Problems
from the pricey,-pricey,-pricey... dept
The story of bringing fiber optics to the home has always been that it was that "last mile" that was the killer in terms of cost. More recently, some people have trimmed that down to the last "fifty feet" or so, as it's just that final connection that seems so costly. However, others are beginning to realize there's another cost on the other side -- once you're in the home. People working to set up IPTV systems (often associated with fiber to the home, though it doesn't have to be) are discovering that anyone who wants to set up a few TVs is costing the provider a lot of money -- and it's money that the service provider simply can't charge for, or no one will sign up for the service. This is why some providers will do things like offer free installation only for one or two rooms. However, it appears that one big area for development is creating systems to make it easier to transmit high bandwidth offerings within the house cheaply. Over time, this should sort itself out, but as long as the expenses are still high, it certainly could limit early adoption, as no one will want to pay the cost of setting up the system when the existing system that's already in place is seen as "good enough." One answer may be to look to wireless systems, as running wires is a good part of the expense. Unfortunately, most wireless systems are still capacity constrained in a way that won't help solve this problem any time soon.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
What about CAT5?
What's so expensive about running the CAT5 around a house for extra TVs, or even running it outside the house and into each wall? They have to do this with regular coax for cable TV, and with CAT5 the expensive time consuming fiber installations aren't a problem.
And ethernet's plenty fast enough for any consumer use for the forseeable future.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: What about CAT5?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Architecture
I love it when the cable guy comes to the house with his foot-long drill bit and starts drilling holes through the siding into the house, and through the floors to the basement.
Maybe architects can design built-in passageways for future cabling required in a house.
I know a guy who about ten years ago had his newly constructed house wired with CAT5 to support his computer network, only to realize a couple of years ago that the wiring is obsolete due to the advent of wireless home networks. He also wired all of his cable outlets from a central point with RG5, and now wishes it was RG6.
The point is that the delivery method changes, and it would be nice if houses could provide easy methods to adapt so that the outside of the house doesn't become a web of wires drilled through the walls.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]