If All The Cool Bloggers Can Wiki, How About A Major Newspaper?

from the um.--no. dept

You know those times when someone who obviously shouldn't, tries out a new style of clothing or a bit of slang to try to seem cooler/younger/more "in" than they really are and it backfires really badly? Yeah, well, it seems like that's what's about to happen with the LA Times. Michael Kinsley has only been on the job for a little while and he's already trying to shake things up and make the LA Times seem a little more with-it when it comes to the digital crowd. However, his latest move just sounds bizarre. He's going to be adding editable "wikitorials" -- editorials that anyone will be able to go in and edit themselves. While you have to think it's nice that a newspaper recognizes what a wiki is, you have to wonder if the folks at the LA Times recognize that this isn't actually what a wiki is useful for. Wikis work in collaborative environments for brainstorming in building up an idea or a concept -- not in taking a fully formed opinion piece and then letting everyone mess around with it. This makes even less sense than asking a few readers to blog about articles in the paper. At least that has the potential to be interesting. The wikitorial concept just seems like the newspaper trying to jump on the wiki bandwagon without ever understanding what a wiki is useful for or why anyone would want to go in and edit an editorial.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Danno, 13 Jun 2005 @ 8:59am

    Hmmm...

    Oh, I dunno, sounds kind of interesting to me, like a new way of creating common consensus or something.

    If anyone can edit the editorial, it can be edited till everyone likes what it says.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      TJ, 13 Jun 2005 @ 10:36am

      Re: Hmmm...

      Ugh. Opinion piece by committee? I'd bet no one will want to read it, because it ultimately won't say anything.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 13 Jun 2005 @ 11:34am

    This has the potential to be a lot of fun

    But eventually someone with an agenda will use his army of 0wned zombie computers to constantly resubmit his changes so that no one elses opinions are read. The trick is to make sure I'm that someone.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.