More Double Talk From The MPAA On Upcoming Grokster Decision
from the economics-101 dept
It seems that every time Dan Glickman, the head of the MPAA speaks, he says something else questionable. From saying the movie industry should be more like the IRS to saying that BitTorrent technology is to blame for movie sharing online he never seems to understand the real issues his industry is facing. The latest, is that in a talk to the Progress and Freedom Foundation, a group that claims it's supportive of free markets -- but also wants strong government regulation on anything intellectual property related -- Glickman seems to embrace the contradiction this group supports. He says: "shall we keep in place legal protections that promote the free market or shall we tear down those protections in such a way to allow the black market to prosper and dominate?" Well, that's quite a spin, considering that it's the lack of government regulations that makes the market free. Black markets only exist when a market is overly regulated. In fact, that's the whole point of the black market -- to get around government regulations. If he really supported free markets, he'd let the market develop and see what happens, rather than begging the government to prop up his industry. If the MPAA wins Grokster, all it will actually do is create a larger black market, by outlawing plenty of useful technologies, forcing them all to go underground to that black market. Update: Wow. I missed the second part of that quote as found by Constitutional Code: "If we have learned anything over the past 50 years with the collapse of communism and the triumph of free-market capitalism, we have learned that abusing private property rights actually leads to less creativity, less technological development and less freedom." This is the old nugget that people use in favor of intellectual property: that "free" goods somehow equates to communism. This is a bizarre argument, because, once again, it's the free market (not the government) that's making these items free.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
mpaa, free markets, black markets
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: mpaa, free markets, black markets
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
the corporations would have a difficult time keeping the prices much in excess of the reproduction costs.
Remember that monopolies need the threat of force to keep competition out.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
free markets
That's a bit of an oversimplification. Even Adam Smith recognized that a truly free market depended on some regulation, to keep the businesses themselves from distorting the market. That's why we've got anti-trust legislation and the like, not to regulate the freedom out of the market, but to keep it sufficiently free that competition can take place.
There are economists who argue for no market regulation at all, but they're pretty far on the fringe. Most are realistic enough to recognize the need for balance.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
role of regulation
Things can get out of whack in either direction, of course, but in general a certain level of regulation is beneficial, and a certain, negative level is also accepted. But over-the-top systems such as corporatist facism, socialism, rampant devaluation, or France's fabulous-in-the-short-term-system all eventually come a cropper.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: role of regulation
[ link to this | view in chronology ]