Curious Hacking Students Offered A Deal
from the just-as-long-as-they-stop-making-fun-of-the-district dept
The "Kutztown 13" students who were charged with felonies after using the extremely obvious admin password to get around some school district filtering so they could use iChat have now been offered a deal. For a while, the school district insisted that the kids had to be charged with felonies (despite the fact that they didn't do the slightest damage) to make a point. However, the incredibly negative publicity over the matter for the school district has apparently made them rethink the issue. The settlement deal would require 15 hours of community service and an apology. One of the 13 wasn't offered the deal, because he has a previous record. What's most interesting, however, is that some of the students say they might not accept the settlement, claiming that they did nothing wrong, and they don't believe they should be punished for what was harmless curiosity.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Concerned
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Concerned
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
But it sounds to me that the kids were warned multiple times to not do this. Welcome to personal responsibilty and taking the credit and punishment for your actions. The should be punished, feleonies seem kind of much however.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
As in a DAMN AFTER SCHOOL DETENTION! You know, that one punishment they used way back in the day for kids that broke the rules.
Why the hell does the law need to be involved in petty mischief like this?
A fucking FELONY? COMMUNITY SERVICE? Are you kidding me? They are CHILDREN, not criminals. Punishment comes directly from the schools and parents until REAL damage or violence is involved. NO SOONER.
Stop wasting my tax dollars on this shit and FINE the school district for even thinking any of this is necessary.
They are minors, didn't vandalize anything or cause computer issues, and were smart enough to figure out how to do something using their wits and common sense.
As far as I'm concerned, they only proved they are smarter than the faculty and that pissed someone off.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
It seems to me that the only thing they did was possibly violate some sort of school policy. If that is the case, I could understand the school giving them detention, suspending them, or possibly even expelling.
What I do not understand, however, is what felony they are guilty of. I'm not very knowledgeable about technology related laws, but I didn't imagine that using a provided password to access someone's computer was a felony.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
Students chatting on teh internet are not criminals.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
"Using it" to do something is no longer just harmless curiousity.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Deal
This case is about is who's da boss.. nothing more. IT departments frequently like to assert their authority, in both educational and business environments, its simply the way things are. It especially holds true for behavior that won't be tolerated, i.e. a group of renegade students who like to piss off the IT department.
You can rant all you want about it, but that still won't change the outcome. Considering the offenses (breaking into school property, unauthorized use, violating school policy to name a few) the deal seems quite generous.
The kids should take the deal on the table, and take it quick. Any that don't should expect harsh consequences to follow.. and believe me they will.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
The IT guys/gals/whatever should also be called out for using a password that was easily revealed. I think we all know how easy it is to come up with one that is reasonably complex, if not perfect.
Everyone involved should grateful that a major problem was, luckily, avoided while a weakness that could have been expolited for much worse things was discovered before the entire campus knew how to use it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Morons
Only dumbasses think they are innocent!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Actual Law
Here are the actual laws.
COMPUTER TRESSPASS requires damage be done, and COMPUTER THEFT requires an intent to deprive a computer owner of data.
§ 7615. Computer trespass.
(a) Offense defined.--A person commits the offense of computer trespass if he knowingly and without authority or in excess of given authority uses a computer or computer network with the intent to:
(1) temporarily or permanently remove computer data, computer programs or computer software from a computer or computer network;
(2) cause a computer to malfunction, regardless of the amount of time the malfunction persists;
(3) alter or erase any computer data, computer programs or computer software;
(4) effect the creation or alteration of a financial instrument or of an electronic transfer of funds; or
(5) cause physical injury to the property of another.
(b) Grading.--An offense under this section shall constitute a felony of the third degree.
§ 7613. Computer theft.
(a) Offense defined.--A person commits an offense if he unlawfully accesses or exceeds his authorization to access any data from a computer, computer system or computer network or takes or copies any supporting documentation whether existing or residing internal or external to a computer, computer system or computer network of another with the intent to deprive him thereof.
(b) Grading.--An offense under this section shall constitute a felony of the third degree.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Moron
Hey Moron, take notice:
Breaking into someone’s house, using a key or more conventional methods, and using ichat on your, admittedly school issued, computer are significantly different.
If you seriously can’t tell the difference, you have no right to call anyone names. Seriously anyone - you aren’t even smart enough to make fun of W.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]