SanDisk's Big Announcement? How They've Made Flash Less Useful
from the just-great dept
At some point, you would think that everyone would stop buying the industry line about how copy protection technology helps "motivate" content producers. Copy protection makes the content less usable and therefore less valuable to users. In other words, it means they're willing to pay a lot less for it. There's no resale market. They're limited in what they can do with it. It's a value decreasing proposition. Yet, the big content providers claim that it's necessary, and companies believe what they're fed. So, along comes SanDisk, who went around last week telling everyone they had a big announcement this week. What was it? That they've installed their own copy protection technology on flash cards for mobile devices. The journalist at Infoworld repeats the industry line that somehow this "will motivate providers of music, games, movies and other content to sell those products for mobile phones." It may motivate them to try, but it doesn't do much to motivate buyers to buy. It's time that someone called the bluff on this claim. If there are enough people looking for content on their mobile phones, the content providers will find the business models that make sense -- and those aren't made up business models invented by the copy protection, but business models that embrace giving people what they want. Meanwhile, having yet another version of copy protection out there isn't going to make anyone very excited. It's just going to make people less interested in the content.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
No Subject Given
A few won't like it because of the copy-protections, and even fewer may not buy it because of the copy-protection, but they won't be nearly enough to matter to the content providers.
If people want the content they'll buy it no matter how many different protections it has.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
I'm all for supporting the artist, but they are really pushing the customers to find new avenues. Look at how useless DVDs are even with a computer equipped with a DVD player. If you buy what the industry feeds you, you cannot download a movie even if you hold a copy in your hand. If they let you do that, then it would make sense again to buy legitimate copies to support the artists, because then you can put it to some use without fear of being a criminal. If they do that then what difference does it make if someone buys it or not.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Scan disk copyright protection
Article: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9514139/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]