Firewalls Might Be More Useful If They Weren't So Damn Cryptic
from the not-helping-anyone dept
Like many people, I use a software firewall on my computer. On a semi-regular basis, it pops up absolutely cryptic messages, alerting me to something trying to connect to something. The details are never particularly clear, and while most of them are probably legitimate programs doing legitimate things, I've taken to simply denying them all. Every once in a while, this leads to problems, as certain applications stop working properly and I need to go in and figure out what the problem is. Apparently, I'm not the only one dealing with this. Dan Gillmor is complaining about a very similar issue as he tries to figure out if he should allow a certain connection that his firewall is warning him about. The answer appears to be that it shouldn't be a problem -- but he needed an expert to tell him that. That's leading some to wonder if firewalls shouldn't have a bit more expertise (and user friendliness) built in, to give you more clues about what the various connections might mean. Of course, that's incredibly difficult, and even the sample "solutions" provided by David Berlind raise more questions (for example, in one solution, he tries to provide more context by asking people to confirm what their email server is -- but a non-technical person might not know that information). Of course, instead of making the situation better, it looks like some firewall makers are making it worse by turning some of those messages into marketing messages. Jeremy Wagstaff has noticed that ZoneAlarm popped up one of its regular messages that's really just an advertisement for their new anti-spyware product, but it's designed to make you feel like your computer is unsafe.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
http://odonnellweb.com
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: http://odonnellweb.com
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ridiculous
As far as not knowing what a process is doing when asked whether or not it should be allowed to connect to the internet, a simple google search can answer 9 times out of 10. At least this is what I do when I'm having one of those paranoia days.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: ridiculous
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: ridiculous
And obviously there IS a way for them to make it free if others are able to do it. They simply choose not to and pull sneeky acts in order to get more people to purchase. I find that an immoral business practice and therefore I will not use their products.
Who wins now?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: ridiculous
It is freeware.. what do you expect from it.
If you remember, the ad bubble popped 5 years ago. Finding freeware on the net today.. ahem, GOOD freeware.. is dwindling down to nothing. Generally speaking, the net is slowly maturing from a scientific and informational medium to a commercial one, where services are paid for instead of given out free. The trend would also apply to firewall software that is free.
Although, they could make it easier I would agree on that. As most users simply want to install it and ignore it, they don't want to deal with it or even see it. They want to know they're protected, yet don't want the reminders of it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
everyone wan' go heaven, nobody wanna get dead...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Firewalls
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Firewalls
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Firewalls
So yea i'd say at least a good linksys cable/dsl router with NAT would work for most. LOL here is my IP 192.168.1.204 come and get me suckas :D
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Firewalls
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Firewalls
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Firewalls
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Firewalls
Seriously, with idiots like you makes the h4x0rz (again for you n00bz, hackers) time worthwhile.
Its like saying, "An astronaut doesnt need his space suit in outerspace..."
Retarded ignorant bastard...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Firewalls
ANY Windows installation isn't safe. Period. And I can say that without being a linux/OSX zealot either. As a Windows SysAdmin for 13 years, I've seen my share of "I thought it was protected" or "I have a virus scanner" (Unsaid: Way out of date or has a expired subscription)
If you are on cable, the whole underground community knows your phone number. And they case your house constantly. If you don't lock your windows and actually pay attention, you'll get wacked with the next Blaster/Sasser/RedAlert/MyDoom/Etc variant
Software firewalls drag on your CPU cycles. Cheap NAT routers can suffice, if you properly know how to set them up. REAL firewalls, such as the Cisco PIX take time, effort, and knowledge to maintain but nobody gets in.
I enjoy watching my mail filter at work send all kinds of bogus crap from compromised DSL and cable connections (a majority of our spam)
Wonder when I'll see your "I don't need a firewall" connection attempt to spam my mailbox...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Firewalls
I suppose germs don't really exist either right?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Firewalls
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/20/AR2005102001133.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How about no settings at all?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Gotta love stupid people
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ignorance is not bliss
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
These days, you don't have to have very much of a computer IQ to get the a PC running, and with a little creativity, anybody can fix just about anything, as long as they don't let their fear get in the way.
Firewalls have only been something that the general public has really had to worry about for the last 5 years or so. I imagine within the next 5 years, fire wall designers will refine their techniques and make these systems more and more user friendly.
The other side of the coin is exposure. Many of the terms and phraises used in firewalls aren't apart of our normal lexicon. That will change too , thus easing people's pain.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Riiiiiight
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hackers are like Poker Players
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Software firewall == useless
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So simple... it's stupid.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wow
Techie: Jeez, grow up. Firefox is better than IE just because every jackass and script kiddy on the planet is trying to hit IE. Firefox is less of a target, for the moment.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
2 way street
While I realize that ZA isn't anywhere near as secure as a hardware firewall, I'm not going out and buy one for home use and there is at least one good reason to continue using it: keeping tabs on the outgoing stuff helps to find out what if anything is getting reported to 3rd parties.
I am on cable, NAT router, wireless but so far no intrusions to date so it seems to be a pretty effective setup.
Also, AVG antivirus (http://www.grisoft.com) has kept me in good stead for years at no cost. In addition to email, any and everything I download from the web, I force a scan (simple right-click) which has turned up scads of embedded virii in free stuff!
For spyware, MS Antispyware AND Ad-Aware together work pretty well.
In using all of these, you must set them to run the regularly scheduled downloads and updates to keep them current. Don't do that and will get hit.
The bottom line: all for free, no successful intrusions in years, and much much easier and less intrusive than some of the commercial stuff (i.e. Norton Firewall).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What a waste of time
The purpose of a firewall is to prevent someone from gaining access to any part of your PC. If your PC's software has to say, HEY!!! SOMEONE IS TRYING TO LOOK AT ME!!! It kinda defeats the purpose, doesn't it?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]