Is Providing Accurate Whois Info Really That Important?
Former Health Secretary Having Second Thoughts On Getting Chipped?

Can Someone Patent Better Patent Database Queries?

Too Much Free Time

from the too-difficult dept

Thu, Dec 8th 2005 2:21am — Mike Masnick
While we take issue with the idea that people who patent a lot are innovative, it is still interesting to find out about who is doing all this patenting these days. Every year or so some stats get published about what companies are patenting the most things, but apparently getting some of the other stats out of the database is a bit trickier. Slashdot points out that USA Today's Kevin Maney decided he'd like to go interview the top living patent holders in the US... only to find out that the USPTO has no clue and can't come up with an easy way to figure it out. The database query just isn't that easy, and the one guy the office has to do stuff like that has been busy on other projects. Maney took some guesses, based on the last time that info was released (1997), and points out that the US citizen who might have the most US patents (others outside the US have more), has many patents for things like "Method of covering a flower pot." Perhaps that proves the point we were making in the first sentence of this post.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

6 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 8 Dec 2005 @ 6:04am

    No Subject Given

    I read the patent and aside from all the legalese garb, I am still at a loss. What did they invent? Nothing, to me it simply sounds like they are just adding information to a database to include regional businesses. Of course their logic is flawed, because their resoning assumes that all busineses would want to be listed on the net. I am sure that some of the mobile plumbers could care less about this. We all know that word of mouth sells better than anything else.

    [ link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 8 Dec 2005 @ 6:06am

    Re: No Subject Given

    Sorry I posted this to the wrong patent thread. Maybe I could patent an invention that would prevent my own stupidity. Then when a company actually creates something that does that, I could sue them and become rich. Muhaha

    [ link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Michael Birnholz, 8 Dec 2005 @ 6:48am

    Google Patent

    Here is a novel idea. How about Google sending one of their search appliances to the USPTO, then it would actually WORK (the USPTO search).

    [ link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    Nadine, 8 Dec 2005 @ 6:51pm

    If only it were so easy

    You have to consider the database format, how stuff is input into the database. How to get stuff that is currently in the database into a new format (if it is necessary to provide more functionality). Installing it sitewide and training examiners to use it. That is not even considering what research they need to do to properly plan the system and come up with one that will be consistent with the whole Trilateral Office thing.
    It's not impossible, but it will take investment of a lot of time and money. Considering the backlog in some of the art units now (18-30 months before the first O.A.) well...
    (Besides if the gov is making money from the current system, why would they care to change it?)

    [ link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    mhh5, 12 Dec 2005 @ 9:41am

    USPTO doesn't care.

    I ran into this problem yrs ago, and I emailed with a USPTO employee who seemed rather uninterested in improving the accessibility of their systems. They just don't care. So it's up to private services to fill in the gap, and I'm sure the USPTO will make some money off of licensing access to their database.

    [ link to this | view in thread ]

  6. identicon
    Michael Birnholz, 13 Dec 2005 @ 6:37pm

    Re: USPTO doesn't care.

    Ahhh, a new business idea? I think that IP attorneys and inventors would gladly pay for a 'google' version of the USPTO database. I also noticed, that my comments here get indexed quite well at google, so now that I created this business model, perhaps Google will give me a finders fee of some sort :)

    [ link to this | view in thread ]


Is Providing Accurate Whois Info Really That Important?
Former Health Secretary Having Second Thoughts On Getting Chipped?
Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

Friday

19:39 Important Announcement: Techdirt Is Migrating To A New Platform (0)
More arrow

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.