If UPN And The WB Merged, Would Anyone Notice?
from the maybe-not dept
It's almost amazing that the two "other" networks, the WB and UPN made it this far. However, after struggling to pick up more than a couple of viewers, it appears that CBS (newly separated from Viacom) and Time Warner have decided the best way to deal with two networks no one watches is to merge them into one network no one watches, to be called "The CW." Of course, having a bit of competition on TV isn't a bad thing, but instead of just trying to go about things the old fashioned way (scrounging up some random sitcoms and dramas that would prefer to be on a bigger network), why aren't they really trying to embrace the internet population to build buzz? Instead, it seems they're going the traditional route of throwing in the towel by merging and pretending that someone else will deal with the problem of how to find viewers.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Meeting
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Meeting
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
I would think that you folks would be interested in some of the programing that UPN and WB have placed before you in the past decade or so.
The modern Star Trek sagas
Smallville
Supernatural
Buffy The Vampire Slayer
Angel
X-files
Stargate - a very popular show that cbs said would never fly...
and many others.....
you people are fools...
go back to watching your soaps and reality tv...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
X-Files waned after a few seasons, Stargate is now "Specialty TV" that only a few people watch (Firefly anyone?), Supernatural has everyone thinking they know about the occult, Buffy was eclipsed in yawn-inspiring scripts only by Angel, Smallville rapes Superman's past and Star Trek is about as entertaining as a lecture on photosynthesis.
I don't think I missed anything... Most mainstream television is about as entertaining as watching paint dry. There's very few TV shows I even pay attention to that are on mainstream tv. Then again, this is all just my opinion, so feel free to disagree.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
They also stated that in 2007 they then hope to expand programming to a full TWO hours.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
Just because they keep making "Survivor" doesn't mean it's any good.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
UPN hasn't had a good show in ages, though.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Buffy?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
Smallville = Crap
Supernatural = Crap
Buffy The Vampire Slayer = Crap
Angel = Crap
X-files - Wrong Channel Jackass
Stargate - a very popular show that cbs said would never fly... = Crap
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Commentors, you're missing the point!
I think we're all mising the and focusing too much on the content of the channels and not so much on the focus of the article, using internet buzz to generate viewers for a struggling network.
I think it's a nice idea, but my question to Mike would be how? Since there is no "central" place on the internet that everyone goes to, how do you generate buzz? Do you place some ads on prominent sites (that tends to just erk people), do you send out some people to "pose" as excited fans on forums? How do you do it?
As per the quality of shows on WB and UPN, I would offer up to you that most of us can find shows on network TV that are crappy. I personally liked Angel, thought it and Buffy created a whole genre of TV, it was campy and soap operaish, but wasn't afraid to laugh at itself. However, I don't like shows like Lost or American Idol, which get lots of viewers apparently. Whatever I do and don't like, I think it's my own opinion and wouldn't stoop to calling other peoples opinions "Crap" like some people here have.
Come on people, let's not turn this forum into another one of the garbage places where teenie boppers who can't spell come to use words that mommy and daddy wouldn't let them use!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Commentors, you're missing the point!
IMHO, it's much more likely the opposite is true: that the internet population (or as much of it as possible) embraces a show, rather than the other way around, and that's pretty much a hit-or-miss proposition. Who would have figured that shows like Buffy, Firefly, or even the Adult Swim block would have generated their own sizeable internet cult followings?
I also think that need networks like UPN and the WB, simply because they're giving an opportunity to shows that wouldn't fit into the major networks' programming. They both stepped into the void left behind by Fox, which used to be the "edgy" network until it went mainstream.
But what do I know? My favorite show is "Good Eats."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Commentors, you're missing the point!
Good Eats is one of my favorites too, you're not alone.
Another personal fave, mythbusters.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Well..
One can only hope they take it as a chance to evolve somehow, and make CW viable.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
As for "embracing the internet population", that's a fairly nebulous proposition with little real meaning. I'm sure every network head at the majors has seen a powerpoint presentation on "Embracing The Internet Population", and they all have fine websites, fan forums, and that stuff. However, the best website ever won't make me want to watch the stuff ABC, CBS, Fox, and NBC are shoveling at us.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
If you like smart, strong women, also thry Veronica Mars (UPN)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
...except for Lost and Nip/Tuck which appears on neither of those channels.
To hell with them, let them become a super mogul of bad television!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Smallville
but i dont think stargate was ever on either of those, it was on fox, now its on sci-fi, also my fav actors (mcguiver!) aren't on it anymore and they have turned it into more of a sci-fi channel funked show (with stock sci-fi channel actors) which i no longer really like... but for like 7 seasons it was pure gold! pure gold jerry!!
also smallville rules, its getting better and better every season
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mainstream TV
As soon as they start paying for good shows that can reach out to many different demographics these networks will put out "specialty" niche stuff.
But the answer to the question of the hour is NO. Nobody will notice! We will just have one less local channel to surf through. Boohoo!!!
Look at what works on Network TV. News, 24, West Wing, Commander in Chief (for some), ER, random comedy shows and Reality Crap!!! These shows make up about 2% of the shows on network TV. Most people eat the rest of the crap up and they love it. For those who don't they go do/watch something else.
Who cares what is or is not on TV, we have little control over it anyway. Take FOX for example. They get something good and then cancel it as was previously mentioned.
As for all the arguing what is good or not, give it a rest. They are opinions! Everyone wins. Go back to degrading others and showing you "pwn" others on other boards and move on to the next topic.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
IMO
[ link to this | view in chronology ]