If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Please Join Techdirt In Celebrating 'National Law Enforcement Appreciation Day!'
- Hey The North Face! When You Said Sending Us A Bogus Trademark Threat Was A Mistake, We Believed You; So Why Did You Do It Again?
- Devin Nunes Retires From Congress To Spend More Time Banning Satirical Cows From Trump's New Social Network
- Ken Popehat White (Again) Shows How To Respond To A Completely Thuggish Legal Threat Letter
- Minnesota Dept. Of Public Safety Now Handing Out License/Insurance Carriers In Hopes Of Keeping Cops From Killing More Drivers
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
By any other name...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
blah...
OH YEEEAHHHH! TOOTH ME BABY!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: blah...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: blah...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: blah...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Reasons it seems unplausable
In order for phone A to send phone B data over bluetooth, the two have to "pair up", that is, negotiate a connection.
Phone A has to be broadcasting its bluetooth ID so that Phone B can "see" Phone A in a list of nearby connections (Similar to SSID in wireless networks)
It is possible for a device to be constantly broadcasting this ID (which would be necsisary for this kind of contact to happen) but HIGHLY unlikely due to the ammount of battery drainage that would occur.
My own phone only broadcasts the ID for 15 seconds at a time, so if I wanted to make myself contactable I would have to sit there pushing the button over and over and over again, and then my phone would prolly die after a half hour.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]