Calling Space Elevator Proponents: NASA Offering Prizes For Inventions
from the games-and-prizes dept
The concept of public contests to spur innovation has been gaining momentum, with successful results in both DARPA's Grand Challenge (unmanned vehicles) and the Ansari X-Prize (private space launch). Now NASA is getting into the game, launching a series of 13 challenges, with cash prizes to independent inventors in researchers, in areas such as self-assembled devices and, of course, space elevator technology. Given how much money has been spent on NASA, and the perception that much of it is wasteful, it's nice that they're exploring new ways of funding research. It could work very well in NASA's case as their enormous budget, compared to any other space-related enterprise, has a crowding out effect on the field -- sort of the way government issued bonds can draw money away from other investments. Some of the other benefits include distributing the costs among various institutions, avoiding groupthink, and getting the public excited about the area, all things that NASA could use right now. Besides, this is the age of user-generated content, why shouldn't it work for space travel?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: space elevator
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Try another 200 stories at least!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
otis... blah!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
a few more stories...
Although how tall is a story really? 12-15 feet?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
wtf
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Jumping in Elevators
quote "NASA is not wasting money."
It isn't a waste of money because it's marketing and lots of fun as I have already mentioned, also the Government is paying for it so it is not defined as a waste of money but 'non critical expenditure.'
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Space Elevator
Payloads could be hoisted into space above the Earth's gravity, released and then small...cheap to manufacture...boosters could be fired to push satelites into higher orbit. Spacecraft would no longer need heat shielding for re-entering the Earth's atmosphere because the burn is caused the incredible speeds normal craft must travel at. Shuttles launched from a launch platform rig lifted into space on a space elevator don't need as much fuel, don't need heat shielding except for rare emergencies and should be able to stay up for longer periods of time because it would be possible to carry extra fuel and supplies which normally wouldn't have been possible due to weight-to-lift issues with current rocket technology.
Thus, it is within NASA's best interest that they get a Space Elevator working and as soon as possible.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Gas we have Lots..
A gas could be used to do this if incase with the item your sending up to space then guided to its location of need.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
how high?
The most common idea for how to build it is to run a thread from a geosynchronous (Non-orbiting fixed location) satellite to a location on the ground and then use robotic factories that would build a carbon fiber cable (nano-tech) working their way up the thread. You keep making it thicker with each trip. Read Red Mars by Kim Staney Robinson.
This is not rocket science. NASA has a team that believes they could build one now if they had the cash.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Gravity and floating
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/orbv.html
In other words, if you just pop something into an elevator and take it up to a LEO (low earth orbit) altitude of a few hundred or thousand kilometers and push it out the door, it will essentially just fall back to earth at 10 m/s/s!
I believe you might have a chance if you go up to 36,000 km (Geosynchronous orbit).
The idea behind using an elevator is still a good one in the same way using a baloon to float the payload up to a high altitude and then finishing the job off with a rocket works. You are spreeding your "WORK" over "TIME" and you are also not wasting a lot of energy in lifting a massive rocket full of fuel. You still have to lift the elevator but you don't have to lift the energy source.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Almost done...
http://www.liftport.com/
I think this would be an awsome addition to the space program. The only problem I forsee is terrorism.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Space Elevator
GeoSynchronous Orbit is 26,000 miles.
(that is an orbit that is stationary above one point over equator).
Top-side Elevator anchor would be just pass GeoSynchronous Orbit; This is essentially a Suspension Bridge that you climb up the cable.
BTW, there is no modern technology to create cable/ribbon that is strong enough to support its own weight, much less cargo.
The closest thing using today's technology is Buckmeister-Fullerine (Buckey Balls) Carbon Nano-tubes.
Look to Science Fiction;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_elevator_in_fiction
Probably most well known is:
"The Fountains of Paradise" by Arthur C. Clarke.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
lets go fly a kite
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]