Webaroo Downloads Hype To Your Hard-Drive
from the the-entire-web-on-your-computer dept
As internet access becomes ubiquitous, times when it is unavailable have mercifully become rare. Yet, the hot web startup du jour, Webaroo, is targeting these shrinking, fleeting moments -- offering up large chunks of the web to download and browse while offline. The company believes that using compression and algorithms (red flag right there) they can deliver large chunks of quality content to users' devices. But, even if there remains large periods of time when people are unable to access the internet (currently plane rides stand out as the big one), is downloading and surfing the internet really what consumers want to do during this time? For one thing, the offline internet can never be the same thing as the online internet, since it's no longer a two-way medium. There's no email, sharing, downloading media, etc. Instead, what you have is a one-way medium, more akin to TV or magazines. Given this, it seems that users could just as easily download various articles, songs, and movies that they'd like to consume for periods when they know they'll be offline. In fact, this seems like a much more efficient use of hard drive space than the 40 gigabyte chunks that Webaroo will offer (and could it really be the whole internet as they claim?). Still, they're not the only company looking to bring internet content offline. Techdirt Greenhouse presenter Commendo is trying to do something similar, allowing users to automatically download the content of sites that they like. Having content locally hosted also has the advantage of being faster than material online, but how often is this really a problem? Both of these companies, however, seem to be targeting a rapidly dwindling market with their current strategies. It's also interesting to note how much coverage Webaroo has been getting, almost none of it questioning the company's strategy. Seems like quite a successful blitz from the company's PR folks.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
It's the question
Well, answer is: no.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Doesn't this cheapen the whole concept?
Remember those?
Creating static content for digestion at anytime certainly isn't a NEW idea, but it's a stale idea. The Internet has become a dynamic and fluid medium, and contributors who are gearing up to devolve the current standards of rapid change and dynamic content are, IMHO, setting themselves up for failure.
I'm sure we'll see "Webaroo" on the sidelines soon, left on one of the many dead-end offramps so many other more novel companies have taken OFF the "information superhighway".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
oooh..shiny
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: oooh..shiny
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Its about personalization
Commendo believes that it should be the individual who selects what information to record, because only you know what content you will need to Plan, Play, Shop and Sell. You don't download all the songs from a specific rock genre into iTunes for your personal library, so why do that for the Web?
Voyager lets you record, organize and share your content, whether it be interactive database driven pages, podcasts, pre-recorded streaming media, or services like AJAX mash-ups. Once the content is on your PC, you can interact with it as though you were online - sans the Internet lag, buffering and jitteriness.
The PC freed people from the shackles of the mainframe. Voyager frees you from the tyranny of the web.
Download Voyager and Get Free! www.commendo.com
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Its about personalization
The beauty of the web is that its a 2-way street. Personailze all you want, in the end, without the others reacting to you, or you reacting to other users, it quickly becomes boring.
Lee
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Its about personalization
Stop trying to sell me this and instead tell me about what I'm gonna want to use it for. I don't have it, I've never felt a lack for it, so it's going to take more than a few less than catchy phrases to get me to check it out...The world is a big place, and there are LOTS of free things to try...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
WRONG WAY
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Get out my boots!
There's another techbubble a-comin', Ma!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Looks like that is what the startup scene is turning in, a PR circus. People with connections in media and blog (Om et. al.) scene oil their way in. But then, that is just the first 5%. Getting a customer to part with his hard earned money on something like this won't be that easy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
so 1997
As far back as '95 I recall applications that would perform a get of an entire website for local browsing. In fact, I still use an app called blackwidow that I downloaded 5+ years ago to grab entire copies of my competitors websites. I can have a record of their site at a specific time or a record of when they blatantly copied content from my site... all locally browsable.
What's new here? Slapping 'mobile' and 'algorithm' on the package? Bueller, Bueller...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
bla
[ link to this | view in chronology ]