Earth-Shattering Study Confirms Young People Dig New Technology
from the now-that-that's-put-to-rest dept
A trend may be afoot to bring social networking to the older set, but according to a new study from Forrester, it's actually -- get this -- young people who are more inclined to use social networking sites, IM and SMS. Think that seems obvious? It gets better. Among baby boomers, younger ones use new technologies more than their older counterparts. It seems these analyst firms just can't resist putting out painfully obvious studies relating to internet use. It's not clear exactly what purpose a study like this serves other than to grab a few headlines and confirm the old saw that if you want to learn how a new device works, you better find a kid. Of course, if you do find this useful, a fuller explanation of these insights are available for a mere $995.00.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
who buys these studies?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Or...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
studying the obvious
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
haha
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It has been shown
Oh and the latest report shows that it's unsafe to fall down staircases.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It has been shown
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
er wait a new toy.... Yeaaahhhhh
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
LOOK! SOMETHING SHINY!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ha
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Slow day at techdirt? cmon, try sending something juicy down the tube. I'm getting hungry for another Republicans are evil, Google is now God argument.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sigh.
So get a life then. Be happy someone did it for you.
SOMEONE MUST PROVE AND DOCUMENT things (and be held accountable for any conclusions drawn). We can't walk around in life saying well of course, thats painfully obvious to everything. Some things are painfully obvious. Some are not. Some things are inadmissable in court unless there is an expert to back it up. Some things are inadmissable in a boardroom unless there is evidence to back up a strategic move.
Sure, flame someones career because you think that what they did is worthless. Meanwhile, they ARE doing something useful for society (and for future generations, they are DOCUMENTING what life was like now) and your bitching that you think they are not is definitely NOT USEFUL.
People though Newton was wasting his time by documenting the effects of gravity and coming up with some basic theories on why. Later someone else was able to take his doucmentation, and determine something else about it.
Face it, we live in an information age. We NEED things documented. We ARE GOING TO document them. Yeah, it sure can be tedious at times. That makes it no less significant or important.
Oh, and this just in... 90% of the 90% that hate their jobs are too lazy/smug to find a job they like.
Leaving 10% in a job they like, 1% not capable of finding a job they like. BUT THE OTHER 89% JUST SIT AROUND BITCHING ABOUT THEIR JOBS and whining about someone else's easy job.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Sigh.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Sigh.
I have assumed all my life that grass is green. Never mind that everybody tells me this.
I'm going to apply for a government grant, and PROVE it once and for all!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Sigh.
I'm going to apply for a government grant, and PROVE it once and for all!"
uhm, there is an entire field of science for that. And horticulture is nothing but mundane documentation that gets most of it funds from government.
So, by all means, go right ahead.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Sigh.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Sigh.
About a month ago there was a headline stating that maybe "dirty is better". It was an article about how dirty rats have a better immune system than clean lab rats. Jesus, this is 6th grade science. When exposed to things, you develop a stronger immunity. Hence, sometimes dirty is better. Well, now it's documented. But the act of documenting that specific is redundant.
I'm all for documentation, but redundancy is just crazy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
damit!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Employers are seeing that technology can be a distraction for younger employees, even though the benefits of technology seem obvious. I've seen plenty of younger workers modifying color schemes, settings, and downloading gadgets while the guy next to them, 10 years older, never messes with it, gets his work done, and gets promoted, leaving his young neighbor thinking "this job is too hard" or "they want too much from me." And then they get seriously pissed (and hopefully quit) when we lock down their system.
The study may seem pointless, but it establishes a basis for the next set of questions; like how do we get young people to stop playing with toys and focus on making money?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
All very funny
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
yawn
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
how do we get young people to stop playing with to
the sooner the workforce is free of baby boomers, the happier we will all be.
why?
1) there are so many of them
2) they are at the peak of their earning potential, once they are gone there will be more payroll to go around
3) they expect to make more than any other generation in history which skews the average income for a given profession
4) many of them think technology peaked with email
i wish i had a dollar for every old white dude i have met who has his secretary print his emails.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Toys for kids, money for adults
I like money -- and I make more when my employees work better. If they would figure that out I WOULD PAY THEM MORE. But as long as they see work as evil, they get nowhere -- hear me Chris?
Every generation should expect to make more than the previous one -- that's called progress.
I don't work with boomers, we are all X'ers -- we love money and we love toys, but we don't rely on the toys to do our jobs. When I see the 22 year old IMing all day, and asking for better equipment, while the 32 year old next to him gets his shit done every day so he can go home and party, who do you think I will pay more? And who earned the upgrade?
Boomers and Xers don't hate technology, we use it to make money. But technology can be a distraction from the actual work, and thats a real problem.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]