Someone Should Teach The Pentagon About Expedia And Travelocity
from the they-work! dept
What is it about the government that they always seem to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on unnecessary computer systems that don't work? The FBI famously spent hundreds of millions of dollars on a system that never worked at all and had to be scrapped in favor of a new $500 million system that we have little confidence will work very well either. Especially when the FBI doesn't seem willing to use things like Google when they could help. So, it should come as no surprise to find out that the Pentagon's new travel booking system, which they undoubtedly spent millions on, is the type of system that Pentagon employees work to get around using, rather than actually using. A study has found that the system "fails to find the cheapest airfares, offers an incomplete list of flights and hotels and won't recognize travel categories used by the National Guard and Reserves." Instead, most Pentagon employees end up calling up travel agents or do the booking on their own, and then manually enter it into the system. In fact 83% of Pentagon trips are set up outside of the system. Aren't you glad your taxpayer money went to this fancy system that no one actually uses because it can't hold a candle to other options? As with the FBI system, it looks like a case where some defense contractors convinced the deep pocketed government to spend millions on building a system from scratch when they could have just used tools that were already out there and, well, battle tested.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Gov'ment Idiocy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You can bet that if a bloodhound like the Special Prosecutor who got Abramoff was let loose on this case he'd find major graft.
With enough public outcry in the newspapers and an ally or two in Congress, it could happen. Of course, that assumes anyone really cares.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Thank goodness its not for health care
This is the kind of website you'll be required to use to get a bottle of asprin.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Thank goodness its not for health care
As a former firefighter, EMT, Paramedic, I came across many people who had worked all their lives but couldn't afford basic health care for themselves which, to me, is a travesty. I believe 'Socialized' medicine would be one of the best things that ever happened here in the US. We just need to break the strangle-hold of big health care corporations, giant multinational drug companies and the mystique that doctors are some kind of gods which, I assure you, they aren't.
Just my two cents worth.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Thank goodness its not for health care
I think you missed the point. Do you really want the same organization that brought us the $500 toilet seat taking over the medical industry?
Once there is an enforced monopoly, do you really think that you will still receive good medical care?
Remember the government enforced phone monopoly? Remember "we don't care, we don't have to, we're the phone company?" Do you really want the hospital or the doctor on call to have that attitude?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Thank goodness its not for health care
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Thank goodness its not for health
So, you're going to punish me and mine because of your choices? If you want medical, work for a large corporation. If you want the freedom and challenges of being self employed, fine -- but don't complain and try to take away from me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Thank goodness its not for health care
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Thank goodness its not for health care
And just why do all the Canadians that can afford it come across the border for health care?
What are the results if we factor out the illegal aliens in the United States? Read up on how they're flooding California's hospitals. Take them out of equation and the American system is probably better.
By the way, I worked with an English gentlemen who was rather irrate at his native country for telling his mother to go home and die because she was too old for health care. Single payer doesn't magically produce less cost. And monopolies historically have hideous service -- which is what the medical field is all about.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yet another example
We must be sheep.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So many of you fear the government is going to make you "sheep" -- have you ever considered the possibility that you've already been hoodwinked by corporate interests and their Republican errand boys?
Oops, sorry, I didn't mean to say "Republicans" and "boys" in the same sentence -- the former's all too likely to stalk, harass, and attempt to seduce the latter.
There's nothing wrong with having and expressing an informed opinion -- but jumping to conclusions without first getting the facts is irresponsible. Maybe the Pentagon travel system really is a terrible waste of money -- we can't actually tell from the article, can we?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
And of course when Democrat Studds stalked, harassed, and actually had sex with the pages (versus just virtual sex) that was okay, because it was a Democrat performing gay statutory rape.
Give it up. Both the Democrats and the Republicans are sleaze buckets.
Oh, and the Democrat gay pedophile Studds kept his job and the Democrat leadership didn't do anything.
Congratulations on your blatant partisan hypocrisy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
why dint they do a "dogpile engine"
heck, they could even figure out what taxes they don't have to pay for being govt, and what the price is directly from the hotel or airline so they don't have to pay the middleman of the travel site...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Gov idiocy
I find it very hard to believe that money for "special" areas comes from a normal place. This money was probably spent on a secret "something" that needed this kind of money.
Makes a lot more sense than "We hired the dumbest idiots on the face of the planet to build us a crappy system! They spent hundreds of millions of dollars to build us a system that never worked in the first place. All this to avoid falling into a common place with the rest of the U.S."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
being a real user of the system...
so /rant. was the system expensive: yes. did it save the gov't money: yes (from a military perspective: the personnel required to do this at any finance office was substantial, plus the doctors needed to care for them, the housing, the long term medical for those that retired, the retirement pay, the added supervisory chain for more people, etc)...yes in the course of the project it will save the gov't a lot of money
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: being a real user of the system...
Thank you for your insight on the system.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: being a real user of the system...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
DTS = Defense Travel System :)
I have to research what flights I want to take right off the DTS web site. I did compare them to web sites such as Expedia and Travelocity. The prices were relatively the same. DTS even recommends which ones to take by recommending the cheapest flights. I am speaking for myself. I have no clue how many people actually do research.
I am not saying the government is perfect, but I am saying that the government is trying to fix things. There are many ways to fix things. You could add to the problem or offer a way to help. Where are your suggestions?
I would also like to remind everybody that the government is run by the people. If you think something could be done better or you think you can do better contact your mayor, city counselor, congressman or apply for the thousands of available government positions out there. Join the military, join your local ASPCA, hell, I do not care. Just quit complaining about things that you can change.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: DTS = Defense Travel System :)
Who are "the people"? The people at large? The taxpayer? Joe voter? What color is the sky in your world?
In my world, the government is run by bureaucrats who get the same pay whether they solve my problem or tell me to stick it. I interface with a government project that is using obsolete equipment, paying a massive premium for it, and no one cares. Why? Because the paperwork to change the specification is too painful – much better to keep buying expensive, obsolete equipment that they don’t make any more. If you point this out to anybody what happens? They no longer give you the information that you need to do your job.
So, you were almost right. The government is run “by people” (not “the people”). And these people don’t work for the commercial world because they are incompetent, have their own little power trips, or are too stupid and lazy to get a job elsewhere.
Are all government workers worthless piles of excrement that should be incinerated? No. Only about 75 to 90% of the government civilian workforce.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Govtrip
I've never seen a worse web site... it crashes right and left, produces options that don't actually exist, and the like. My personal favorite was when all the airline schedules were annotated as "seating not available", which, I found out later from talking to a human being to get around a govrtip crash, actually meant that they hadn't gotten the lists of available seats from the airlines, not that the seats were not actually available.
The web site would have been bad enough if Govtrip actually was useful once you managed to work around the bugs, but it isn't. For example, to fly non-stop round-trip the 300 mile flight from New York City to Buffalo, NY costs $1,050.00 through Govtrip, and $240 if you book yourself a flight with Jet Blue...
Stu's comment above hit's the problem right on the head... this is just a good old fashioned case of someone in a position of authority abusing that authority by sending tons of taxpayer's money to their pals in the private sector, in this case a defense contractor. There's no way in the world a system that wouldn't meet commercial standards anywhere was given the business legitimately.
Ken, dude, I'm glad you have success with DTS, it's certainly not what happens with it's brother Govtrip.
Faz
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Govtrip
Not to detract from anything you said, but government software developers aren't so hot either. I've seen plenty of software projects developed by government personnel that are as totally worthless as what you describe.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Govtrip
Actually I wouldn't make the argument that web sites should be made by gov't programmers... we use other sites for various purposes (personnel, financial, that kind of thing) that have been coded by private contractors and they actually are usable, commercial grade products that save the taxpayer's money and our time.
Our old travel system consisted of separate programs, one was internal to the agency that was used to input financial information (travel orders and then vouchers to actually reimburse you) and the other was a web site run by the travel agancy that had the contract and which was used to schedule and book tickets.
The travel agency's site worked just fine (and it's cost was included in their fee, unlike Govtrip) and the internal program was awkward but it worked, too, Combining the two is a good idea, in theory, but in practice it's a gigantic mess.
If govtrip worked I'd be all for it, but it doesn't work, and that's the issue: The gov't is paying big bucks for what is essentially a website that combines two databases into one and it's getting massively ripped off. Hundreds of millions of dollars for running a web site?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
DTS, GovTrip - Pentagon Not the Bad Guy
Having been a (government) program manager, and having worked with developers to try to develop a comprehensive, user-friendly, piece of software for a broad user base, I can tell you that it reminded me of having a dozen cooks in a kitchen, each with their own idea of the "perfect" receipe for apple pie. They can't agreee on the kind of apples, to say nothing of the spices.
The military health care system recently underwent a major transformation in automating medical records and appointment scheduling throughout the forces. It was done quietly, and with no fanfare. Let's cheer for some of the successes in the system, rather than resorting to Government-bashing for every failed attempt at improvement.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Welcome to Orwell's World
Oh my God, you're right. I forgot. The government is my friend. War is Peace. Freedom is Slavery. The government is here to help. Everything is okay. I like it the way it is. I wish everything was like the government ... More power to the government ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
DTS is as bad if not worse than NMCI
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
GovTrip travel accounting system
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
DTS still a burden to tax payers
[ link to this | view in chronology ]