Pumping And Dumping Is Much Faster When You Can Do Both Yourself With Hacked Accounts
from the much-more-efficient-that-way dept
Back during the first dot com bubble, the stock pump and dump scam worked by buying some stock, and then sending out a bunch of spam promoting the stock, then quickly selling your own stock. While a lot of the new deluge of spam seems to be trying that same thing (and, apparently, it's working), some organized crime groups apparently found a much more efficient way of doing things. As mentioned late last year, some scammers hacked a bunch of accounts at various popular online brokers for use in a pump and dump scam. The Washington Post has some more details on exactly how it worked, as the SEC has brought charges against one man involved in the scam. It's basically exactly what you'd expect. The guy bought a bunch of a certain penny stock with his account. Then logged into a bunch of other accounts, sold all their stock and used the proceeds to buy the stock that he had just purchased, pumping up the price. Then, quickly sell the stock in his own account and cash out. The article details one example of this, where he cleared about $13,000 in less than 2 hours.Two additional interesting things come out of the article. The first is that at least some of the brokerages seemed to catch on to the fraud pretty quickly (though, not quickly enough). In the example case given, Charles Schwab catches onto the fraud less than 10 minutes after one of their accounts is involved, and blocks another transaction. The other interesting point, is that the Washington Post followed up with a CEO at one of the companies whose stock was pumped and dumped. As we've noted in the past, it's often quite a hassle for those companies, but in this particular case, it's now made it very difficult, as the fraud helped blow a business deal, and at least one of the brokerages will no longer let anyone trade that stock. Oh yeah, as for the man being charged by the SEC? He fled the country and no one actually seems to know where he is. The money is also long gone.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
hmmm
Question for the stock market wizards. Could the trading system recognise this as an anomoly and freeze the accounts ? Or is this intrinsically what the system is designed to do when traders operate.
Would a time limit between trades help in any way?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
good idea, but
p.s. buy ADVR:OTC .032 could it hit 23.75 a share
i get these faxes all the time.
(but not with ADVR i really own that one lol)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wow
This is just so lame. If people really understood how much crap like this really goes on, they would just take their money and bury it in their back yard (of course, then maybe AOL would try to dig it up looking for more treasure.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Unacceptable
I had recently been thinking about beginning to use online trading instead of going in to talk with a broker. Will I now? I doubt it if they cannot prove they have changes the security measures there is no way I will trust my money and identity to them. Heck if they can't protect their own files how will they protect mine.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Unnaceptable
[ link to this | view in chronology ]