Abuser Of DMCA Rescinds Bunk Takedown Notices

from the aptronym dept

Tue, Feb 13th 2007 4:23am — Joseph Weisenthal

Wouldn't it be nice if everyone who did things like send specious cease and desist letters or hollow DMCA takedown notices had to pay a price for their abuse of the law? Typically, those on the receiving end of these notices don't find it worth their time or money to fight back, so those who abuse the system rarely face any consequences. Last November, we linked to the story of Michael Crook, who sent a bunch of takedown notices to websites that posted a screenshot of his appearance on Fox News. His complaint was obviously rubbish since not only were the sites well within their fair use rights, but he didn't even own the copyright on the screenshot. Fortunately, the EFF sued Crook for abusing the DMCA, and has won a settlement from him. The exact terms are unclear, but apparently he agreed to write all of the websites that he threatened and rescind his takedown notice. That, in itself, isn't much of a punishment, but it's still nice that he's been rebuked, especially since he vowed to take down the EFF after they announced their lawsuit. So now that he's been dealt with, we just need to do something about all the other illegitimate DMCA takedown notices that get sent out.Update: A reader writes in to let us know that technically the lawsuit against Crook was brought by Jeff Diehl and 10 Zen Monkeys, with legal assistance from the EFF. Also, there's apparently more to the settlement that hasn't been publicized yet, and that when these details come out, internet users should be "extremely surprised and satisfied".

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

11 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Micheal Crook, 13 Feb 2007 @ 5:36am

I am not a crook!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Richard Nixon, 13 Feb 2007 @ 6:26am

Neither am I!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bill Clinton (profile), 13 Feb 2007 @ 7:03am

I did not copyright sex with that woman!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
John Doe, 13 Feb 2007 @ 7:14am

How embarrasing for this man Crook, I would not want to be him ....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Joshua, 13 Feb 2007 @ 8:17am

How to punish them for bogus takedown notices?
It's simple. Make abusing the system in that fashion a criminal offense. There should not be a possibility of settling or of not being sued for it because the real copyright holder is lazy, it should be a court fine and/or prison. That way, script generated takedown notices are also affected. Maybe we could bring in a bit of that "ignorance is no excuse" stuff to it as well.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Spartacus, 13 Feb 2007 @ 8:26am

links?
Why do "posted a screenshot" and "rescind his takedown notice" link to the same TD article from November? This article just links to old techdirt articles... link mistake?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Joe, 13 Feb 2007 @ 9:49am
  
  Re: links?
  Spartacus,
  Thanks for the catch. I've added in the proper link.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Shiek Yerbooty, 13 Feb 2007 @ 9:07am

I think this is the same Mike Crook from "forsakethetroops.com" and "forsakethecops.com" infamey. I'm not positive, but on michaelcrook.com, he discusses his DCMA suit but calls it "ongoing", perhaps he's just a slow blogger.

Whatever he is, he's a moron and it's nice to see a warm cup of comeuppance come his way.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
quasidan, 13 Feb 2007 @ 12:59pm

awesome.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Monty Python, 13 Feb 2007 @ 1:24pm

Is your wife into photography?
Click Click Nudge Nudge Say no more? MP
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
KEN DIRUBIS, 13 Feb 2007 @ 2:15pm

Take a look at this guy....
He actually looks kinda cute. Can't he just get a girlfriend or something and stop being such a jerk?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]